Manifold reaching paradigm: how do we handle target redundancy?
- 1 October 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Neurophysiology
- Vol. 106 (4), 2086-2102
- https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01063.2010
Abstract
How the central nervous system coordinates the many intrinsic degrees of freedom of the musculoskeletal system is a recurrent question in motor control. Numerous studies addressed it by considering redundant reaching tasks such as point-to-point arm movements, for which many joint trajectories and muscle activations are usually compatible with a single goal. There exists, however, a different, extrinsic kind of redundancy that is target redundancy. Many times, indeed, the final point to reach is neither specified nor unique. In this study, we aim to understand how the central nervous system tackles such an extrinsic redundancy by considering a reaching-to-a-manifold paradigm, more specifically an arm pointing to a long vertical bar. In this case, the endpoint is not defined a priori and, therefore, subjects are free to choose any point on the bar to successfully achieve the task. We investigated the strategies used by subjects to handle this presented choice. Our results indicate both intersubject and intertrial consistency with respect to the freedom provided by the task. However, the subjects' behavior is found to be more variable than during classical point-to-point reaches. Interestingly, the average arm trajectories to the bar and the structure of intertrial endpoint variations could be explained via stochastic optimal control with an energy/smoothness expected cost and signal-dependent motor noise. We conclude that target redundancy is first overcome during movement planning and then exploited during movement execution, in agreement with stochastic optimal feedback control principles, which illustrates how the complementary problems of goal and movement selection may be resolved at once.Keywords
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- Attention, Intention, and Priority in the Parietal LobeAnnual Review of Neuroscience, 2010
- Intention, Action Planning, and Decision Making in Parietal-Frontal CircuitsNeuron, 2009
- Efficient computation of optimal actionsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009
- Redundancy, Self-Motion, and Motor ControlNeural Computation, 2009
- The Inactivation Principle: Mathematical Solutions Minimizing the Absolute Work and Biological Implications for the Planning of Arm MovementsPLoS Computational Biology, 2008
- Decision making, movement planning and statistical decision theoryTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2008
- Noise in the nervous systemNature Reviews Neuroscience, 2008
- Posterior Parietal Cortex Encodes Autonomously Selected Motor PlansNeuron, 2007
- Optimality, stochasticity, and variability in motor behaviorJournal of Computational Neuroscience, 2007
- The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedanceNature, 2001