Designing Higher Surface Area Metal–Organic Frameworks: Are Triple Bonds Better Than Phenyls?
- 7 June 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Vol. 134 (24), 9860-9863
- https://doi.org/10.1021/ja302623w
Abstract
We have synthesized, characterized, and computationally validated the high Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area and hydrogen uptake of a new, noncatenating metal–organic framework (MOF) material, NU-111. Our results imply that replacing the phenyl spacers of organic linkers with triple-bond spacers is an effective strategy for boosting molecule-accessible gravimetric surface areas of MOFs and related high-porosity materials.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- The current status of hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworks—updatedEnergy & Environmental Science, 2011
- A Metal–Organic Framework with Optimized Open Metal Sites and Pore Spaces for High Methane Storage at Room TemperatureAngewandte Chemie-International Edition, 2011
- Hydrogen Storage in Metal–Organic FrameworksAdvanced Materials, 2010
- High and Selective CO2 Uptake in a Cobalt Adeninate Metal−Organic Framework Exhibiting Pyrimidine- and Amino-Decorated PoresJournal of the American Chemical Society, 2009
- Soft porous crystalsNature Chemistry, 2009
- A new MOF-505 analog exhibiting high acetylene storageChemical Communications, 2009
- Selective gas adsorption and separation in metal–organic frameworksChemical Society Reviews, 2009
- Hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworksChemical Society Reviews, 2009
- The Reticular Chemistry Structure Resource (RCSR) Database of, and Symbols for, Crystal NetsAccounts of Chemical Research, 2008
- Hybrid porous solids: past, present, futureChemical Society Reviews, 2007