Comparison of biosimilar CT-P10 and innovator rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled Phase 3 trial
Open Access
- 16 July 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in mAbs
- Vol. 10 (6), 934-943
- https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2018.1487912
Abstract
This multinational, randomized, double-blind trial, (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02149121) was designed to demonstrate equivalence in pharmacokinetics and efficacy between CT-P10 and innovator rituximab (RTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Adults with active RA were treated with CT-P10, United States-sourced RTX (US-RTX; Rituxan®), or European Union-sourced RTX (EU-RTX; MabThera®) at weeks 0 and 2. The co-primary pharmacokinetic endpoints were area under the serum concentration–time curve (AUC) from time zero to last measurable concentration (AUC0–last), AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC0–∞), and maximum concentration (Cmax) after two infusions. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 24 in Disease Activity Score using 28 joints-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP). Pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and safety were also assessed. 372 patients were randomly assigned to CT-P10 (n = 161) or RTX (n = 211 [US-RTX, n = 151; EU-RTX, n = 60]). For the co-primary pharmacokinetic endpoints, 90% confidence intervals (CI) for ratios of geometric means (CT-P10/US-RTX, CT-P10/EU-RTX or EU-RTX/US-RTX) all fell within the equivalence margin of 80–125%. Adjusted least squares (LS) mean (standard error) change from baseline in DAS28-CRP at week 24 was −2.13 (0.175) for CT-P10 and −2.09 (0.176) for RTX. The 95% CI (−0.29, 0.21) of the estimated treatment difference between CT-P10 and RTX (−0.04) was entirely within the efficacy equivalence margin of ±0.5. Pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and safety profiles were similar for CT-P10 and RTX. The pharmacokinetics of CT-P10, US-RTX, and EU-RTX were equivalent. CT-P10 and RTX were also equivalent in terms of efficacy and displayed similar pharmacodynamic, immunogenicity, and safety profiles up to week 24.Keywords
Funding Information
- CELLTRION Inc., Incheon, South Korea
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety of the biosimilar CT-P10 compared with rituximab in patients with previously untreated advanced-stage follicular lymphoma: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 3 trialThe Lancet Haematology, 2017
- Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Innovator Rituximab to Biosimilar CT-P10 Compared with Continued Treatment with CT-P10: Results of a 56-Week Open-Label Study in Patients with Rheumatoid ArthritisBioDrugs, 2017
- The Rituximab Biosimilar CT-P10 in Rheumatology and Cancer: A Budget Impact Analysis in 28 European CountriesAdvances in Therapy, 2017
- Safety and efficacy of biosimilars in oncologyThe Lancet Oncology, 2016
- 2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisArthritis Care & Research, 2015
- Efficacy and safety of different doses and retreatment of rituximab: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in patients who are biological naive with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate (Study Evaluating Rituximab's Efficacy in MTX iNadequate rEsponders (SERENE))Annals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2010
- Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy: Results of a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase III trial evaluating primary efficacy and safety at twenty‐four weeksArthritis & Rheumatism, 2006
- The efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment: Results of a phase IIB randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐ranging trialArthritis & Rheumatism, 2006
- The Disease Activity Score and the EULAR response criteria.2005
- Efficacy of B-Cell–Targeted Therapy with Rituximab in Patients with Rheumatoid ArthritisThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2004