When enough is not enough: Information overload and metacognitive decisions to stop studying information.
Open Access
- 1 June 2016
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Vol. 42 (6), 914-924
- https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000213
Abstract
People are often exposed to more information than they can actually remember. Despite this frequent form of information overload, little is known about how much information people choose to remember. Using a novel "stop" paradigm, the current research examined whether and how people choose to stop receiving new-possibly overwhelming-information with the intent to maximize memory performance. Participants were presented with a long list of items and were rewarded for the number of correctly remembered words in a following free recall test. Critically, participants in a stop condition were provided with the option to stop the presentation of the remaining words at any time during the list, whereas participants in a control condition were presented with all items. Across 5 experiments, the authors found that participants tended to stop the presentation of the items to maximize the number of recalled items, but this decision ironically led to decreased memory performance relative to the control group. This pattern was consistent even after controlling for possible confounding factors (e.g., task demands). The results indicated a general, false belief that we can remember a larger number of items if we restrict the quantity of learning materials. These findings suggest people have an incomplete understanding of how we remember excessive amounts of information. (PsycINFO Database RecordFunding Information
- Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (CIG630680)
- JSPS KAKENHI (15H05401)
- National Institutes of Health (R01AG044335)
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consolidation power of extrinsic rewards: Reward cues enhance long-term memory for irrelevant past events.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2014
- On the effectiveness of self-paced learningJournal of Memory and Language, 2011
- The development of memory efficiency and value-directed remembering across the life span: A cross-sectional study of memory and selectivity.Developmental Psychology, 2011
- Betting on memory leads to metacognitive improvement by younger and older adults.Psychology and Aging, 2011
- Metacognitive Judgments and Control of StudyCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 2009
- Optimising self-regulated study: The benefits—and costs—of dropping flashcardsMemory, 2008
- The English Lexicon ProjectBehavior Research Methods, 2007
- A recency-based account of the list length effect in free recallMemory & Cognition, 2002
- What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect self-paced studyActa Psychologica, 1998
- Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect."Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1988