Competition, economic benefits, trust, and risk perception in siting a potentially hazardous facility
- 30 May 2009
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Landscape and Urban Planning
- Vol. 91 (1), 8-16
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.11.005
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analysis of Local Acceptance of a Radioactive Waste Disposal FacilityRisk Analysis, 2008
- On the right track? Technology, geology and society in Swedish nuclear waste managementJournal of Risk Research, 2004
- Can we learn from failure? Examining US experiences with nuclear repository sitingJournal of Risk Research, 2004
- An Analysis of Nuclear Risk Perception: With Focus on Developing Effective Policy AlternativesInternational Review of Public Administration, 2004
- Reversing NIMBY: An Assessment of State Strategies for Siting Hazardous-Waste FacilitiesEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 1999
- Canadian Innovations in Siting Hazardous Waste Management FacilitiesEnvironmental Management, 1998
- On‐Site Storage of High Level Nuclear Waste: Attitudes and Perceptions of Local ResidentsRisk Analysis, 1996
- The siting of locally unwanted land uses: Towards a cooperative approachProgress in Planning, 1991
- Public Attitudes Toward Siting a High‐Level Nuclear Waste Repository in NevadaRisk Analysis, 1990
- How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefitsPolicy Sciences, 1978