How can we regulate medicines better?
- 18 October 2007
- Vol. 335 (7624), 803-805
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39281.615706.94
Abstract
Agency's role The agency gives opinions on the quality, safety, and efficacy of new drugs that manufacturers want to market in the European Union. The European Commission uses the agency's opinions to decide whether to grant a licence. Unlike the US Food and Drug Administration, the European agency is not autonomous but an expression of the national agencies in the European Union, which approve most new products. Evaluation through the centralised procedure has become mandatory for biotechnology products and drugs for HIV, cancer, neurovegetative disorders, diabetes, rare diseases, the autoimmune system, and viral diseases. The European agency is important because central authorisation is increasing and because national agencies cannot justify adopting methods and criteria inconsistent with those of the central agency. When national agencies come to differing decisions, the European agency makes a final decision that is binding in all member states.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- COX-2 Inhibitors, Other NSAIDs, and Cardiovascular RiskJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2006
- Quality Control in the Regulation of PharmaceuticalsPharmacoEconomics, 2005
- Postmarketing Surveillance—Lack of Vigilance, Lack of TrustJAMA, 2004
- Open access to industry's clinically relevant dataBMJ, 2004
- In the dark: drug companies should be forced to publish all the results of clinical trials.2004
- How can research ethics committees protect patients better?BMJ, 2003
- A model for the future conduct of pharmacovigilancePharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2002
- Adjusting Europe's drug regulation to public health needsThe Lancet, 2001
- Content and quality of 2000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 50 yearsBMJ, 1998
- Statistical Power, Sample Size, and Their Reporting in Randomized Controlled TrialsJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1994