Randomized Study of Intravenous versus Subcutaneous Interleukin-2, and IFNα in Patients with Good Prognosis Metastatic Renal Cancer
- 14 September 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 14 (18), 5907-5912
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-0236
Abstract
Purpose: Metastatic renal cancer patients with a single metastatic site are potentially amenable to interleukin 2 (IL-2) + IFN-α. A French immunotherapy intergroup multicenter trial assessed the potential benefit of i.v. over s.c. administration of IL-2 in this combination. Experimental Design: Untreated patients with one metastatic site were randomized to continuous i.v. infusion (18 × 106 IU/m2/d; arm A) or twice daily s.c. injections (9 × 106 or 18 × 106 IU; arm B) of IL-2, associated with s.c. IFN-α (6 × 106 IU) 3 days per week in both arms. Tumor response was assessed (WHO criteria) at weeks 12 and 24 to 26. The primary end point was overall survival, with an expected 15% improvement at 4 years with i.v. IL-2. The planned sample size was 220 (80% power, 5% significance, one-sided test). Intent-to-treat analysis was done and survivals were compared using log-rank tests. Results: From January 2000 to January 2005, 80 and 75 patients were randomized to arms A and B, respectively. Enrollment was stopped early because of low accrual; analysis was done at 42.5 months median follow-up. Patient characteristics were well balanced between groups. Response rates were 17.9% versus 21.3% in arms A and B. Progression-free survival rates were not significantly different. Overall survival difference was not significant: median 33 months (95% confidence interval, 27.0-40.2; P = 0.202). Conclusions: In combination with IFN-α in selected, good prognosis metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients, i.v. IL-2 offers no significant advantage over s.c. IL-2 and induces higher toxicity. Although i.v. IL-2 induced longer responses, it seems unreasonable to continue recommending this regimen after the recent introduction of more effective therapies.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, double-blind phase III trialThe Lancet, 2007
- Medroxyprogesterone, interferon alfa‐2a, interleukin 2, or combination of both cytokines in patients with metastatic renal carcinoma of intermediate prognosisCancer, 2007
- Novel approaches in the therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinomaWorld Journal of Urology, 2005
- Prognostic Factors in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell CarcinomaClinical Cancer Research, 2004
- Subcutaneous Interleukin-2 and Interferon Alfa Administration in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Final Results of SCAPP III, a Large, Multicenter, Phase II, Nonrandomized Study With Sequential Analysis Design—The Subcutaneous Administration Propeukin Program Cooperative GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Randomized Study of High-Dose and Low-Dose Interleukin-2 in Patients With Metastatic Renal CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Recombinant Human Interleukin-2, Recombinant Human Interferon Alfa-2a, or Both in Metastatic Renal-Cell CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Interferon alfa and vinblastine versus medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinomaUrology, 1995
- The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality-of-Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in OncologyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958