The Friendly Media Phenomenon: A Cross-National Analysis of Cross-Cutting Exposure
- 8 February 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Political Communication
- Vol. 28 (1), 42-66
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.544280
Abstract
We hypothesize that in the real world, as opposed to the lab, the norm is for people to experience friendly media that favor their political predispositions when political favoritism is perceived at all. For this reason, media are generally limited in their ability to create cross-cutting exposure. We test this hypothesis using representative survey data drawn from 11 different countries with varying media systems. We further hypothesize that television will contribute more to cross-cutting exposure than newspapers. Finally, and most importantly, we test the hypothesis that the more the structure of a country's media system parallels that of its political parties, the more that country's population will be dominated by exposure to like-minded views via mass media. We find confirmation for all 3 of these hypotheses and discuss their implications for the role of mass media in providing exposure to cross-cutting political perspectives.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Not the end of journalism historyJournalism, 2009
- A Comparative Analysis of Political Communication Systems and Voter TurnoutAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2009
- Selective Exposure to Campaign Communication: The Role of Anticipated Agreement and Issue Public MembershipThe Journal of Politics, 2008
- Media-Party Parallelism and Its Effects: A Cross-National Comparative StudyPolitical Communication, 2007
- PARTY IDENTIFICATION: Unmoved Mover or Sum of Preferences?Annual Review of Political Science, 2006
- Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in PracticeAmerican Political Science Review, 2002
- Projection or Persuasive Press? Contrary Effects of Personal Opinion and Perceived News Coverage on Estimates of Public OpinionJournal of Communication, 2002
- Who Gets the News? Alternative Measures of News Reception and Their Implications for ResearchPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1993
- Biased Press or Biased Public? Attitudes Toward Media Coverage of Social GroupsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1992
- Populist Politics, Communications Media and Large Scale Societal IntegrationSociological Theory, 1988