The Status of Soft Law in Interpreting the Lithuanian Constitution
Open Access
- 8 December 2021
- journal article
- Published by Vilnius University Press in Teisė
- Vol. 121, 98-114
- https://doi.org/10.15388/teise.2021.121.6
Abstract
In this paper, I examine the status of soft law in the official interpretation of the Lithuanian Constitution. The “living constitution” doctrine dominates the Lithuanian constitutional scholarship. I question this dominance by providing insights on the essence and application potential of the alternative methodology – the doctrine of originalism. Based on originalistic approach, I doubt the normative claim made in Lithuanian constitutional scholarship that soft law could be considered as a mandatory source of interpretation of the Lithuanian Constitution.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Teisė į tos pačios lyties sutuoktinių susijungimą arba dar kartą apie Konstitucijos interpretavimą: vieno Konstitucinio Teismo nutarimo atvejisLOGOS, 2020
- Konstitucinio Teismo įgaliojimai aiškinti savo nutarimus, išvadas, sprendimus: teisinio reguliavimo problemos ir tobulinimo galimybėsTeisė, 2019
- The Future of the European Court of Human Rights—Subsidiarity, Process-Based Review and the Rule of LawHuman Rights Law Review, 2018
- Common-Law Courts in a Civil-Law System:Published by JSTOR ,2018
- The Letter and the Spirit: A Unified Theory of OriginalismSSRN Electronic Journal, 2017
- Teisės normatyvumas ir Konstitucinio Teismo kompetencijaTeisė, 2012
- Purposive Interpretation in LawPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,2005
- The Player and the Cards: Nihilism and Legal TheoryThe Yale Law Journal, 1984