Does a successful comprehensive evaluation increase confidence in a hydrological model intended for climate impact assessment?
- 27 November 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Climatic Change
- Vol. 163 (3), 1165-1185
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02930-z
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Russian Science Support Foundation (19-17-00215, 16-17-10039)
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Time stability of catchment model parameters: Implications for climate impact analysesWater Resources Research, 2011
- Climate non-stationarity – Validity of calibrated rainfall–runoff models for use in climate change studiesJournal of Hydrology, 2010
- Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modellingJournal of Hydrology, 2009
- Cold region river discharge uncertainty—estimates from large Russian riversJournal of Hydrology, 2006
- Model Parameter Estimation Experiment (MOPEX): An overview of science strategy and major results from the second and third workshopsJournal of Hydrology, 2006
- The simulation of runoff from small catchments in the permafrost zone by the SWAP modelWater Resources, 2006
- The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP): motivation and experiment designJournal of Hydrology, 2004
- The simulation of heat and water exchange in the boreal spruce forest by the land-surface model SWAPJournal of Hydrology, 2003
- The hydrology of tomorrowHydrological Sciences Journal, 1986
- A Statistical Exploration of the Relationships of Soil Moisture Characteristics to the Physical Properties of SoilsWater Resources Research, 1984