Deciding Thrombolysis in AIS Based on Automated versus on WhatsApp Interpreted ASPECTS, a Reliability and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Developing System of Care
Open Access
- 19 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Neurology
- Vol. 11, 333
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00333
Abstract
Background: Automated ASPECTS has the potential of reducing interobserver variability in the determination of early ischemic changes. We aimed to assess the performance of an automated ASPECTS vs. ASPECTS interpreted for sent CT images on WhatsApp and to correlate these results with the outcome. Materials and Methods: Patients with anterior circulation stroke who had baseline NCCT and underwent successful IV-thrombolysis were included. NCCT-ASPECTS was assessed by two neuroradiologists, and discrepancies were resolved by agreement. Two groups of patients were included; group 1, where treatment was decided after an automated ASPECTS interpretation that was provided by RAPID software, and group 2, where patients received IV-tPA after an assessment of CT images sent on WhatsApp. Results: A total of 122 patients were included: 36 in group 1 and 86 in group 2. In group 2, the interobserver agreement for NCCT ASPECTS was moderate (κ = 0.36), as was the dichotomized data (κ = 0.44). IOA, however, improved (to κ = 0.57 and κ = 0.64) when the same CT images were interpreted on a workstation. In group 1, Automated ASPECTS showed excellent agreement (κ = 0.80) with agreement reads for workstation images. There were significantly (P < 0.001) increased odds of functional independence and fewer hemorrhagic complications with thrombolyzed patients in group 1. Conclusions: Automated ASPECTS provided by the RAPID@IschemaView ASPECTS performs at a level equal to the agreement read of expert neuroradiologists, and this performance was severely degraded when WhatsApp captured CT images used for ASPECTS assessment. In our study, we found that automated ASPECTS might predict outcomes after IV thrombolysis.This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interobserver Agreement of ASPECT Score Distribution for Noncontrast CT, CT Angiography, and CT Perfusion in Acute StrokeStroke, 2013
- The Smartphone in Medicine: A Review of Current and Potential Use Among Physicians and StudentsJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2012
- Video clip transfer of radiological images using a mobile telephone in emergency neurosurgical consultations (3G Multi-Media Messaging Service)British Journal of Neurosurgery, 2011
- Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic strokePublished by Wiley ,2009
- Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Scoring of CT Perfusion in Early Stroke Visualization and AssessmentAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology, 2007
- How well does ASPECTS predict the outcome of acute stroke treated with IV tPA?Neurology, 2006
- Extent of Early Ischemic Changes on Computed Tomography (CT) Before ThrombolysisStroke, 2006
- Thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: results of the Canadian Alteplase for Stroke Effectiveness StudyCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2005
- Hypodensity of >1/3 Middle Cerebral Artery Territory Versus Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score (ASPECTS)Stroke, 2003
- Can stroke physicians and neuroradiologists identify signs of early cerebral infarction on CT?Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1999