A clinical strategy to improve the diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T non-contrast MR coronary angiography for detection of coronary artery disease: combination of whole-heart and volume-targeted imaging
- 1 April 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in European Radiology
- Vol. 31 (4), 1894-1904
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07135-7
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic performance of 1.5-T non-contrast MR coronary angiography (MRCA) for detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) using whole-heart imaging combined with volume-targeted imaging. Methods Forty-five patients scheduled for conventional coronary angiography (CAG) underwent 1.5-T free-breathing non-contrast steady-state free-precession MRCA, including whole-heart and subsequent three-vessel volume-targeted imaging. Coronary stenosis was evaluated as follows: (1) by whole-heart MRCA alone; (2) by combined MRCA (whole-heart plus volume-targeted images). The diagnostic performance for significant stenosis (>= 50% diameter reduction) was evaluated and compared using CAG as a reference standard. Results Combined MRCA was completed in all 45 patients with a total acquisition time of 16.6 +/- 3.3 min. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of combined MRCA per patient were 97% (95% confidence interval 84-100%), 83% (52-98%), and 93% (82-98%), respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of combined MRCA were significantly higher than those of whole-heart MRCA on a per patient (0.97 versus 0.85,p= 0.0078) and per vessel (0.96 versus 0.86,p< 0.0001) basis. Compared with whole-heart MRCA, combined MRCA showed equally high sensitivity but significantly improved specificity on a per patient (83% versus 25%,p= 0.016) and per vessel (85% versus 50%,p< 0.0001) basis. Conclusions 1.5-T non-contrast MRCA combining whole-heart and volume-targeted imaging can detect significant CAD with high sensitivity and moderate specificity. Combined MRCA significantly improves specificity compared with whole-heart imaging alone.Funding Information
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 81873891)
- National Key R&D Program during the 13th Five-Year period (NO. 2016YFC1300402)
- non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (Gran NO. 2018RC320004)
- Central Research Institure Fund of Peking Union Medical College (3332020008)
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- 3D coronary MR angiography at 1.5 T: Volume-targeted versus whole-heart acquisitionJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2013
- Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease Using Magnetic Resonance Coronary Angiography: A National Multicenter TrialJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2010
- ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus DocumentsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2010
- Direct Comparison of Whole-Heart Navigator-Gated Magnetic Resonance Coronary Angiography and 40- and 64-Slice Multidetector Row Computed Tomography to Detect the Coronary Artery Stenosis in Patients Scheduled for Conventional Coronary AngiographyCirculation: Cardiovascular Imaging, 2008
- 3-T Navigator Parallel-Imaging Coronary MR Angiography: Targeted-Volume Versus Whole-Heart AcquisitionAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2008
- Comparison of 3D Free-Breathing Coronary MR Angiography and 64-MDCT Angiography for Detection of Coronary Stenosis in Patients with High Calcium ScoresAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2007
- Detection of Coronary Artery Stenosis With Whole-Heart Coronary Magnetic Resonance AngiographyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006
- Coronary Artery Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA): A Comparison between the Whole-Heart and Volume-Targeted Methods Using a T 2 -Prepared SSFP SequenceJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2006
- The Use of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Identify Reversible Myocardial DysfunctionThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2000