COVID-19 convalescent plasma and randomized clinical trials: explaining conflicting outcomes and finding signals of efficacy
Preprint
- 15 September 2021
- preprint
- Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Abstract
Convalescent plasma (CP) recurs as a frontline treatment in epidemics because it is available as soon as there are survivors. The COVID-19 pandemic represented the first large-scale opportunity to shed light into mechanisms of action, safety and efficacy of CP using modern evidence-based medicine approaches. Studies ranging from observational case series to randomized controlled trials (RCT) have reported highly variable efficacy results for COVID-19 CP (CCP), resulting in uncertainty. Reasons for CCP success and failure may be hidden in study details, which are usually difficult to explain to physicians and the public but provide fertile ground for designing next-generation studies. We analyzed variables associated with efficacy such as clinical settings, disease severity, CCP SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels and function, dose, timing of administration (variously defined as time from onset of symptoms, molecular diagnosis, diagnosis of pneumonia, or hospitalization, or by serostatus), outcomes (defined as hospitalization, requirement for ventilation, clinical improvement or mortality), CCP provenance and time for collection, and criteria for efficacy. Focusing only on the results from the 30 available RCTs we noted that these were more likely to show signals of efficacy, including reductions in mortality, if the plasma neutralizing titer was ≥ 160 and the time to randomization was ≤ 9 days, consistent with passive antibody therapy efficacy requiring dosing with sufficient antibody. The fact that most studies revealed signals of efficacy despite variability in CCP and its use suggest likely therapeutic effects that become apparent despite the data noise. Despite the recent WHO guidelines discouraging CCP usage, the Omicron variant of concern is reminding us the superiority of polyclonal antibody therapies over monoclonal antibodies, and CCP from vaccinated convalescents is likely to be evaluated soonKeywords
This publication has 98 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pathogenesis of COVID-19 from the Perspective of the Damage-Response FrameworkmBio, 2020
- Safety UpdateMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2020
- Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2−Specific Antibody Responses in Coronavirus Disease PatientsEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2020
- An In Vitro Microneutralization Assay for SARS‐CoV‐2 Serology and Drug ScreeningCurrent Protocols in Microbiology, 2020
- A minimal common outcome measure set for COVID-19 clinical researchThe Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2020
- Points to consider in the preparation and transfusion of COVID‐19 convalescent plasmaVox Sanguinis, 2020
- The convalescent sera option for containing COVID-19JCI Insight, 2020
- Neutralizing Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 in a COVID-19 Recovered Patient Cohort and Their ImplicationsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2020
- Hark back: Passive immunotherapy for influenza and other serious infectionsCritical Care Medicine, 2010
- Evidence Favoring the Use of Anticoagulants in the Hospital Phase of Acute Myocardial InfarctionThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1977