Readability of online COVID-19 health information: a comparison between four English speaking countries
Open Access
- 13 November 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Public Health
- Vol. 20 (1), 1-12
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09710-5
Abstract
The internet is now the first line source of health information for many people worldwide. In the current Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic, health information is being produced, revised, updated and disseminated at an increasingly rapid rate. The general public are faced with a plethora of misinformation regarding COVID-19 and the readability of online information has an impact on their understanding of the disease. The accessibility of online healthcare information relating to COVID-19 is unknown. We sought to evaluate the readability of online information relating to COVID-19 in four English speaking regions: Ireland, the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States, and compare readability of website source provenance and regional origin. The Google® search engine was used to collate the first 20 webpage URLs for three individual searches for ‘COVID’, ‘COVID-19’, and ‘coronavirus’ from Ireland, the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States. The Gunning Fog Index (GFI), Flesch-Kincaid Grade (FKG) Score, Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) score were calculated to assess the readability. There were poor levels of readability webpages reviewed, with only 17.2% of webpages at a universally readable level. There was a significant difference in readability between the different webpages based on their information source (p < 0.01). Public Health organisations and Government organisations provided the most readable COVID-19 material, while digital media sources were significantly less readable. There were no significant differences in readability between regions. Much of the general public have relied on online information during the pandemic. Information on COVID-19 should be made more readable, and those writing webpages and information tools should ensure universal accessibility is considered in their production. Governments and healthcare practitioners should have an awareness of the online sources of information available, and ensure that readability of our own productions is at a universally readable level which will increase understanding and adherence to health guidelines.Keywords
Other Versions
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Search Engine Ranking, Quality, and Content of Web Pages That Are Critical Versus Noncritical of Human Papillomavirus VaccineJournal of Adolescent Health, 2015
- Readability of Ebola Information on Websites of Public Health Agencies, United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and EuropeEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2015
- Health Literacy and Online Educational Resources: An Opportunity to Educate PatientsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2015
- Quality of online information about sexually transmitted diseasesOnline Information Review, 2014
- Assessing the quality of online information for patients with carotid diseaseInternational Journal of Surgery, 2013
- A framework for the evaluation of patient information leafletsHealth Expectations, 2011
- Readability of online health information: implications for health literacyInformatics for Health and Social Care, 2011
- A readability assessment of online Parkinson’s disease informationJournal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 2010
- Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.2008
- Trust and Sources of Health InformationArchives of Internal Medicine, 2005