Subjectively Reported Effects Experienced in an Actively Shielded 7T MRI: A Large-Scale Study
Open Access
- 1 October 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Vol. 52 (4), 1265-1276
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27139
Abstract
Background Ultrahigh-field (UHF) MRI advances towards clinical use. Patient compliance is generally high, but few large-scale studies have investigated the effects experienced in 7T MRI systems, especially considering peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and caregiving. Purpose To evaluate the quantity, the intensity, and subjective experiences from short-term effects, focusing on the levels of comfort and compliance of subjects. Study Type Prospective. Population In all, 954 consecutive MRIs in 801 subjects for 3 years. Field Strength 7T. Assessment After the 7T examination, a questionnaire was used to collect data. Statistical Tests Descriptive statistics, Spearman's rank correlation, Mann-Whitney U-test, and t-test. Results The majority (63%) of subjects agreed that the MRI experience was comfortable and 93% would be willing to undergo future 7T MRI as a patient (5% undecided) and 82% for research purposes (12% undecided). The most common short-term effects experienced were dizziness (81%), inconsistent movement (68%), PNS (63%), headache (40%), nausea (32%), metallic taste (12%), and light flashes (8%). Of the subjects who reported having PNS (n = 603), 44% experienced PNS as "not uncomfortable at all," 45% as "little or very little uncomfortable," and 11% as "moderate to very much uncomfortable." Scanner room temperature was experienced more comfortable before (78%) than during (58%) examinations, and the noise level was acceptable by 90% of subjects. Anxiety before the examination was reported by 43%. Patients differed from healthy volunteers regarding an experience of headache, metallic taste, dizziness, or anxiety. Room for improvement was pointed out after 117 examinations concerning given information (n = 73), communication and sound system (n = 35), or nursing care (n = 15). Data Conclusion Subjectively reported effects occur in actively shielded 7T MRI and include physiological responses and individual psychological issues. Although leaving room for improvement, few subjects experienced these effects being so uncomfortable that they would lead to aversion to future UHF examinations. Level of Evidence 1 Technical Efficacy Stage 5Funding Information
- Skåne University Hospital foundations and donations.
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- MRI‐related FDA adverse event reports: A 10‐yr reviewMedical Physics, 2019
- The physics of MRI safetyJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2017
- 7T: Physics, safety, and potential clinical applicationsJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2017
- Key clinical benefits of neuroimaging at 7 TNeuroImage, 2016
- Short-term side-effects of brain MR examination at 7 T: a single-centre experienceEuropean Radiology, 2014
- 7‐T MR—from research to clinical applications?NMR in Biomedicine, 2011
- MRI Magnetic Field Stimulates Rotational Sensors of the BrainCurrent Biology, 2011
- A large-scale study on subjective perception of discomfort during 7 and 1.5 T MRI examinationsBioelectromagnetics, 2011
- Ultra-high-field magnetic resonance: Why and when?World Journal of Radiology, 2010
- Static magnetic field effects on human subjects related to magnetic resonance imaging systemsProgress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 2005