Potential Development of Sustainable 3D-Printed Meat Analogues: A Review
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 17 January 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 13 (2), 938
- https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020938
Abstract
To mitigate the threat of climate change driven by livestock meat production, a multifaceted approach that incorporates dietary changes, innovative product development, advances in technologies, and reductions in food wastes/losses is proposed. The emerging technology of 3D printing (3DP) has been recognized for its unprecedented capacity to fabricate food products with intricate structures and reduced material cost and energy. For sustainable 3DP of meat substitutes, the possible materials discussed are derived from in vitro cell culture, meat byproducts/waste, insects, and plants. These material-based approaches are analyzed from their potential environmental effects, technological viability, and consumer acceptance standpoints. Although skeletal muscles and skin are bioprinted for medical applications, they could be utilized as meat without the additional printing of vascular networks. The impediments to bioprinting of meat are lack of food-safe substrates/materials, cost-effectiveness, and scalability. The sustainability of bioprinting could be enhanced by the utilization of generic/universal components or scaffolds and optimization of cell sourcing and fabrication logistics. Despite the availability of several plants and their byproducts and some start-up ventures attempting to fabricate food products, 3D printing of meat analogues remains a challenge. From various insects, powders, proteins (soluble/insoluble), lipids, and fibers are produced, which—in different combinations and at optimal concentrations—can potentially result in superior meat substitutes. Valuable materials derived from meat byproducts/wastes using low energy methods could reduce waste production and offset some greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Apart from printer innovations (speed, precision, and productivity), rational structure of supply chain and optimization of material flow and logistic costs can improve the sustainability of 3D printing. Irrespective of the materials used, perception-related challenges exist for 3D-printed food products. Consumer acceptance could be a significant challenge that could hinder the success of 3D-printed meat analogs.This publication has 83 references indexed in Scilit:
- Environmental Impact of the Production of Mealworms as a Protein Source for Humans – A Life Cycle AssessmentPLOS ONE, 2012
- 3D Bioprinting of heterogeneous aortic valve conduits with alginate/gelatin hydrogelsJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2012
- Carbon Footprints for Food of Animal Origin: What are the Most Preferable Criteria to Measure Animal Yields?Animals, 2012
- Reducing Meat Consumption in Today’s Consumer Society: Questioning the Citizen-Consumer GapJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2011
- Environmental Impacts of Cultured Meat ProductionEnvironmental Science & Technology, 2011
- Utilization of byproducts and waste materials from meat, poultry and fish processing industries: a reviewJournal of Food Science and Technology, 2011
- Nonmeat Protein Alternatives as Meat Extenders and Meat AnalogsComprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 2010
- A cryogenic direct-plotting system for fabrication of 3D collagen scaffolds for tissue engineeringJournal of Materials Chemistry, 2009
- The future of meat consumption — Expert views from FinlandTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 2008
- Attitudes towards meat and meat-eating among adolescents in Norway: a qualitative studyAppetite, 2002