Terminally Differentiated Effector Memory CD8+ T Cells Identify Kidney Transplant Recipients at High Risk of Graft Failure
- 1 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Vol. 31 (4), 876-891
- https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2019080847
Abstract
Background Identifying biomarkers to predict kidney transplant failure and to define new therapeutic targets requires more comprehensive understanding of the immune response to chronic allogeneic stimulation. Methods We investigated the frequency and function of CD8(+) T cell subsets-including effector memory (EM) and terminally differentiated EM (TEMRA)CD8(+) T cells-in blood samples from 284 kidney transplant recipients recruited 1 year post-transplant and followed for a median of 8.3 years. We also analyzed CD8(+) T cell reactivity to donor-specific PBMCs in 24 patients who had received living-donor kidney transplants. Results Increased frequency of circulating TEMRA CD8(+) T cells at 1 year post-transplant associated with increased risk of graft failure during follow-up. This association remained after adjustment for a previously reported composite of eight clinical variables, the Kidney Transplant Failure Score. In contrast, increased frequency of EM CD8(+) T cells associated with reduced risk of graft failure. A distinct TEMRA CD8(+) T cell subpopulation was identified that was characterized by expression of FcyRIIIA (CD16) and by high levels of proinflammatory cytokine secretion and cytotoxic activity. Although donor-specific stimulation induced a similar rapid, early response in EM and TEMRA CD8(+) T cells, CD16 engagement resulted in selective activation of TEMRA CD8(+) T cells, which mediated antibody-dependent cytotoxicity. Conclusions At 1 year post-transplant, the composition of memory CD8(+) T cell subsets in blood improved prediction of 8-year kidney transplant failure compared with a clinical-variables score alone. A subpopulation of TEMRA CD8(+) T cells displays a novel dual mechanism of activation mediated by engagement of the T-cell receptor or of CD16. These findings suggest that TEMRA CD8(+) T cells play a pivotal role in humoral and cellular rejection and reveal the potential value of memory CD8(+) T cell monitoring for predicting risk of kidney transplant failure.Funding Information
- Fondation Progreffe
- Société Française de Transplantation
- ITMO Santé Publique (A13053NS)
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-JSV1-0008-01)
- Réseau Thématique de Recherche et de Soins (RTRS) Fondation de Coopération Scientifique CENTAURE (PAC8 and PAC9)
- ANR (ANR-10-IBHU-005)
- Nantes Metropolis
- Conseil Régional des Pays de la Loire
- Seventh Framework Programme (602470)
- ANR (ANR-11-LABX-0016-01)
- ANR (ANR-17-CE17-0008)
This publication has 69 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and CufflinksNature Protocols, 2012
- Characteristics of alloreactive T cells measured before renal transplantationClinical and Experimental Immunology, 2011
- Sparse PLS discriminant analysis: biologically relevant feature selection and graphical displays for multiclass problemsBMC Bioinformatics, 2011
- Identification of a gene expression profile associated with operational tolerance among a selected group of stable kidney transplant patientsTransplant International, 2011
- Reprogramming of T Cells to Natural Killer–Like Cells upon Bcl11b DeletionScience, 2010
- A CD8+ T cell transcription signature predicts prognosis in autoimmune diseaseNature Medicine, 2010
- Regulatory, Effector, and Cytotoxic T Cell Profiles in Long-Term Kidney Transplant PatientsJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2009
- Circulating Alloreactive T Cells Correlate with Graft Function in Longstanding Renal Transplant RecipientsJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2008
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958