Soil COS Exchange: A Comparison of Three European Ecosystems
Open Access
- 14 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Vol. 34 (4)
- https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gb006202
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Austrian Science Fund (P27176‐B16, P31669‐B22)
- European Social Fund (MJD 257)
This publication has 87 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bacterial CS2 Hydrolases from Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans Strains Are Homologous to the Archaeal Catenane CS2 HydrolaseJournal of Bacteriology, 2013
- Carbonyl Sulfide Hydrolase from Thiobacillus thioparus Strain THI115 Is One of the β-Carbonic Anhydrase Family EnzymesJournal of the American Chemical Society, 2013
- Carbonyl sulfide (COS) as a tracer for canopy photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal conductance: potential and limitations†Plant, Cell & Environment, 2011
- Increasing net CO2 uptake by a Danish beech forest during the period from 1996 to 2009Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2011
- Effect of storage conditions on the assessment of bacterial community structure in soil and human-associated samplesFEMS Microbiology Letters, 2010
- Relationships between carbonyl sulfide (COS) and CO2 during leaf gas exchangeNew Phytologist, 2010
- Photochemical and physical modeling of carbonyl sulfide in the oceanJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2003
- Global budget of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide: Temporal and spatial variations of the dominant sources and sinksJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2002
- Controlling variables for the uptake of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide by soilJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1999
- Factors affecting the photochemical production of carbonyl sulfide in seawaterGeophysical Research Letters, 1994