Achieving Rigor in Qualitative Analysis: The Role of Active Categorization in Theory Building
- 1 July 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Academy of Management in Academy of Management Review
- Vol. 46 (3), 591-612
- https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0482
Abstract
Scholars have long debated how rigor can be achieved in qualitative analysis. To answer this question, we need to better understand how theory is generated from data. Qualitative analysis is, at its core, a categorization process. Nevertheless, despite a surge of interest in categorization within the social sciences, insights from categorization theory have not yet been applied to our understanding of qualitative analysis. Drawing from categorization theory, we argue that the movement from data to theory is an active process in which researchers choose between multiple moves that help them to make sense of their data. In addition, we develop a framework of the main moves that people use when they categorize data and demonstrate that evidence of these moves can also be found in past qualitative scholarship. Our framework emphasizes that if we are not sufficiently reflexive and explicit about the active analytical processes that generate theoretical insights, we cannot be transparent and, thus, rigorous about how we analyze data. We discuss the implications of our framework for increasing rigor in qualitative analysis, for actively constructing categories from data, and for spurring more methodological plurality within qualitative theory building.This publication has 100 references indexed in Scilit:
- Process Studies of Change in Organization and Management: Unveiling Temporality, Activity, and FlowThe Academy of Management Journal, 2013
- The Process of Schema Emergence: Assimilation, Deconstruction, Unitization and the Plurality of AnalogiesThe Academy of Management Journal, 2013
- Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive ResearchOrganizational Research Methods, 2012
- Collective Memory Meets Organizational Identity: Remembering to Forget in a Firm's Rhetorical HistoryThe Academy of Management Journal, 2012
- Institutional Work in the Transformation of an Organizational Field: The Interplay of Boundary Work and Practice WorkAdministrative Science Quarterly, 2010
- The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching, and AssessingTheory Into Practice, 2002
- The Study of Boundaries in the Social SciencesAnnual Review of Sociology, 2002
- Feature Centrality and Conceptual CoherenceCognitive Science, 1998
- Insider/Outsider Research TeamsJournal of Management Inquiry, 1992
- Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteriaQualitative Sociology, 1990