A sleeping giant awakes? The rise of the Institutional Grammar Tool (IGT) in policy research
Open Access
- 25 March 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Journal of Chinese Governance
- Vol. 4 (2), 163-180
- https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2019.1575502
Abstract
The Institutional Grammar Tool (IGT) is an important and relatively recent innovation in policy theory and analysis. It is conceptualized to empirically operationalize the insights of the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework. In the last decade, political scientists have offered a number of applications of the IGT, mainly focused on disclosing and scrutinizing in-depth the textual configurations of policy documents. These efforts, involving micro-level analyses of syntax as well as more general classifications of institutional statements according to rule types, have underpinned empirical projects mainly in the area of environmental and common-pool resources. Applications of IGT are still in their infancy, yet the growing momentum is sufficient for us to review what has been learned so far. We take stock of this recent, fast-growing literature, analyzing a corpus of 26 empirical articles employing IGTs published between 2008 and 2017. We examine them in terms of their empirical domain, hypotheses, and methods of selection and analysis of institutional statements. We find that the existing empirical applications do not add much to explanation, unless they are supported by research questions and hypotheses grounded in theory. We offer three conclusions. First, to exploit the IGT researchers need to go beyond the descriptive, computational approach that has dominated the field until now. Second, IGT studies grounded in explicit hypotheses have more explanatory leverage, and therefore, should be encouraged when adopting the tool outside the Western world. Third, by focusing on rules, researchers can capture findings that are more explanatory and less microscopic.Keywords
Funding Information
- European Research Council (# 694632)
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does Policy Learning Meet the Standards of an Analytical Framework of the Policy Process?Policy Studies Journal, 2018
- Integrating core concepts from the institutional analysis and development framework for the systematic analysis of policy designs: An illustration from the US National Organic Program regulationJournal of Theoretical Politics, 2015
- Unveiling the Features of a Regulatory System: The Institutional Grammar of Tobacco Legislation in MexicoInternational Journal of Public Administration, 2015
- Capturing Structural and Functional Diversity Through Institutional AnalysisUrban Affairs Review, 2014
- Policy Advocacy Coalitions as Causes of Policy Change in China? Analyzing Evidence from Contemporary Environmental PoliticsJournal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 2014
- The Influence of Organizations and Institutions on Wetland Policy Stability: The Rapanos CasePolicy Studies Journal, 2013
- Rules and collective action: an institutional analysis of the performance of irrigation systems in NepalJournal of Institutional Economics, 2011
- The Design and Promise of the Institutional Analysis and Development FrameworkPolicy Studies Journal, 2011
- A Systematic Approach to Institutional Analysis: Applying Crawford and Ostrom’s GrammarPolitical Research Quarterly, 2009
- A Grammar of InstitutionsAmerican Political Science Review, 1995