Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter study in China
- 22 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer
- Vol. 30 (8), 1143-1150
- https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-001340
Abstract
Introduction Recently, the safety of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of cervical cancer has been questioned. This study was designed to compare the disease-free survival and overall survival of abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Methods A total of 1065 patients with early-stage cervical cancer who had undergone abdominal/laparoscopic radical hysterectomy between January 2013 and December 2016 in seven hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. The 1:1 propensity score matching was performed in all patients. Patients with tumor size ≥2 cm and 2 test were used for the comparison of continuous and categorical variables, respectively. The survival curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Results After matching, a total of 812 patients were included in the disease-free survival and overall survival analyses. In the entire cohort, the laparoscopic radical hysterectomy group had a significantly shorter disease-free survival (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.73; p=0.048) but not overall survival (HR 1.60, 95% CI 0.89 to 2.88; p=0.12) when compared with the abdominal radical hysterectomy group. In patients with tumor size ≥2 cm, the laparoscopic radical hysterectomy group had a significantly shorter disease-free survival (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.55; p=0.032) than the abdominal radical hysterectomy group, whereas no significant difference in overall survival (HR 1.90, 95% CI 0.95 to 3.83; p=0.10) was found. Additionally, in patients with tumor size Conclusion Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy was associated with inferior disease-free survival compared with abdominal radical hysterectomy in the entire cohort, as well as in patients with tumor size ≥2 cm. For the surgical treatment of patients with early-stage cervical cancer, priority should be given to open abdominal radical hysterectomy.Keywords
Funding Information
- Sichuan Youth Foundation of Science of Technology (2015JQ0026)
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative Effectiveness of Abdominal versus Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer in the Postdissemination EraCancer Research and Treatment, 2019
- Radical Hysterectomy: Efficacy and Safety in the Dawn of Minimally Invasive TechniquesJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2019
- The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Cervical CancerVirchows Archiv, 2018
- The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancerRadiotherapy and Oncology, 2018
- Cancer statistics in China, 2015CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2016
- Prognostic and Safety Roles in Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysisJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2015
- Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage cervical cancerBMC Cancer, 2015
- Patterns of recurrence and survival after abdominal versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancerJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 2015
- Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroidsCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2014
- Effects of a Simulated CO2 Pneumoperitoneum Environment on the Proliferation, Apoptosis, and Metastasis of Cervical Cancer Cells In VitroMedical Science Monitor, 2014