Hysterectomy versus continuing conservative management: which is better for disseminated intravascular coagulation?
- 20 January 2021
- journal article
- letter
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Archiv für Gynäkologie
- Vol. 305 (2), 537-538
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-05961-8
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conservative management of abnormally invasive placenta complicated by local hyperfibrinolysis and beginning disseminated intravascular coagulationArchiv für Gynäkologie, 2020
- Delayed hysterectomy versus continuing conservative management for placenta percreta: which is better?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2020
- Treatment and outcome of placenta percreta: Primary cesarean hysterectomy versus conservative managementEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2019
- Successful anticoagulant therapy for disseminated intravascular coagulation during conservative management of placenta percreta: a case report and literature reviewBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2017
- Conservative management of placenta percretaInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2017
- Tranexamic Acid for Hyperfibrinolytic Hemorrhage During Conservative Management of Placenta PercretaObstetrics & Gynecology, 2015
- Arteriovenous malformation identification after conservative management of placenta percreta with uterine artery embolization and adjunctive therapyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2011
- Prolongation of a Preterm Pregnancy Complicated by Death of a Single Twin in Utero and Disseminated Intravascular CoagulationThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1984