Deficiencies in paediatric research applications delaying ethics committee approval
Open Access
- 15 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SMW Supporting Association in Swiss Medical Weekly
- Vol. 150 (2526), w20267
- https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2020.20267
Abstract
Careful preparation of submission documents by the investigators and close adherence to formal and legal requirements have the potential to considerably optimise and expedite the ethics committee review process, and thus the commencement of the clinical research.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improved informed consent documents for biomedical research do not increase patients’ understanding but reduce enrolment: a study in real settingsBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2015
- A Scoping Review of Empirical Research Relating to Quality and Effectiveness of Research Ethics ReviewPLOS ONE, 2015
- StaR Child Health: Developing Evidence-Based Guidance for the Design, Conduct, and Reporting of Pediatric TrialsPEDIATRICS, 2012
- IntroductionPEDIATRICS, 2012
- Burdens on Research Imposed by Institutional Review Boards: The State of the Evidence and Its Implications for Regulatory ReformThe Milbank Quarterly, 2011
- A Systematic Review of the Empirical Literature Evaluating IRBs: What We Know and What We Still Need to LearnJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2011
- Non-therapeutic research with minors: how do chairpersons of German research ethics committees decide?Journal of Medical Ethics, 2004