Dimensionality of the system usability scale among professionals using internet-based interventions for depression: a confirmatory factor analysis
Open Access
- 12 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Psychiatry
- Vol. 20 (1), 1-10
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02627-8
Abstract
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is used to measure usability of internet-based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (iCBT). However, whether the SUS is a valid instrument to measure usability in this context is unclear. The aim of this study is to assess the factor structure of the SUS, measuring usability of iCBT for depression in a sample of professionals. In addition, the psychometric properties (reliability, convergent validity) of the SUS were tested. A sample of 242 professionals using iCBT for depression from 6 European countries completed the SUS. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted to test whether a one-factor, two-factor, tone-model or bi-direct model would fit the data best. Reliability was assessed using complementary statistical indices (e.g. omega). To assess convergent validity, the SUS total score was correlated with an adapted Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-3). CFA supported the one-factor, two-factor and tone-model, but the bi-factor model fitted the data best (Comparative Fit Index = 0.992, Tucker Lewis Index = 0.985, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.055, Standardized Root Mean Square Residual = 0.042 (respectively χ2diff (9) = 69.82, p < 0.001; χ2diff (8) = 33.04, p < 0.001). Reliability of the SUS was good (ω = 0.91). The total SUS score correlated moderately with the CSQ-3 (CSQ1 rs = .49, p < 0.001; CSQ2 rs = .46, p < 0.001; CSQ3 rs = .38, p < 0.001), indicating convergent validity. Although the SUS seems to have a multidimensional structure, the best model showed that the total sumscore of the SUS appears to be a valid and interpretable measure to assess the usability of internet-based interventions when used by professionals in mental healthcare.Keywords
Funding Information
- European Commission (621000)
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing User Satisfaction in the Era of User Experience: Comparison of the SUS, UMUX, and UMUX-LITE as a Function of Product ExperienceInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 2015
- Relative Performance of Categorical Diagonally Weighted Least Squares and Robust Maximum Likelihood EstimationStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2014
- Multidimensionality and Structural Coefficient Bias in Structural Equation ModelingEducational and Psychological Measurement, 2012
- The Usability Metric for User ExperienceInteracting with Computers, 2010
- Factor Analysis with Ordinal Indicators: A Monte Carlo Study Comparing DWLS and ULS EstimationStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009
- On the dimensionality of the System Usability Scale: a test of alternative measurement modelsCognitive Processing, 2009
- The Factor Structure of the System Usability ScaleLecture Notes in Computer Science, 2009
- When Can Subscores Have Value?Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2008
- Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999
- Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural ResearchJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1970