Does triggering learners’ interest make them overconfident?
- 1 April 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Educational Psychology
- Vol. 114 (3), 482-497
- https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000649
Abstract
Educational Impact and Implications Statement Engaging students has long been a major priority for educators and students alike, compelling teachers to find ways to trigger and maintain students' "situational interest" through humor, animation, and other ploys. We explored a possible metacognitive risk to those ploys. In two experiments, we found that raising students' interest (relative to a control group) in novel topics made them overestimate how well they learned the topics and how well they could later answer questions on these topics. This overconfidence, in turn, convinced them to avoid studying the fun topics when considering which topics to revisit for additional study. The findings raise intriguing implications for educators about when and how best to trigger students' interest when learning. Educators often use stories, humor, surprise, images, or other ploys to catch students' interest. This form of interest, often called "situational interest" because of how it is triggered by contextual cues, can facilitate learning to some degree. Yet it also may carry risks. This article proposes one such potential risk: flawed metacognition, in the form of inflated judgments of learning (JOLs) and overconfident estimates of future performance (calibration bias). Two experiments tested this hypothesis. In each, college students (Ns = 201, 196) read passages on a novel topic (the physics of lighEDU-2020-0310 tning in Study 1; the Hare Krishna organization in Study 2), crafted to be relatively dull or interesting. They then reported their interest, JOLs, and performance estimates before completing a test of their topic knowledge. Otherwise, their methods differed in several ways, such as how situational interest was induced and how performance was measured. Despite those differences, the findings from each study confirmed that situational interest inflated participants' JOLs and promoted overconfident performance estimates. Furthermore, Study 2 showed that those inaccurate metacognitive judgments affect studying decisions; due to their inflated JOLs, participants allocated less of their limited time for restudy to the fun passages. Potential moderators are considered, as are implications for interest theory, for metacognition theory, and for educators more generally.Keywords
This publication has 69 references indexed in Scilit:
- University student’s goal profiles and metacomprehension accuracyEducational Psychology, 2013
- A review of research and a meta-analysis of the seductive detail effectEducational Research Review, 2012
- Calibration Research: Where Do We Go from Here?Frontiers in Psychology, 2012
- Revisiting the Conceptualization, Measurement, and Generation of InterestEducational Psychologist, 2011
- Situational interest, computer self‐efficacy and self‐regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance educationBritish Journal of Educational Technology, 2011
- Judgments of learning reflect encoding fluency: Conclusive evidence for the ease-of-processing hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2011
- Different strokes for different folks: How individual interest moderates the effects of situational factors on task interest.Journal of Educational Psychology, 2007
- When self-efficacy negatively relates to motivation and performance in a learning context.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006
- The effects of text-based interest on attention and recall.Journal of Educational Psychology, 2000
- Test prediction and performance in a classroom context.Journal of Educational Psychology, 2000