Optimizing the selection of fillers in police lineups
- 15 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Vol. 118 (8)
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2017292118
Abstract
A typical police lineup contains a photo of one suspect (who is innocent in a target-absent lineup and guilty in a target-present lineup) plus photos of five or more fillers who are known to be innocent. To create a fair lineup in which the suspect does not stand out, two filler selection methods are commonly used. In the first, fillers are selected if they are similar in appearance to the suspect. In the second, fillers are selected if they possess facial features included in the witness’s description of the culprit (e.g., “20-y-old white male”). The police sometimes use a combination of the two methods by selecting description-matched fillers whose appearance is also similar to that of the suspect in the lineup. Decades of research on which approach is better remains unsettled. Here, we tested a counterintuitive prediction made by a formal model based on signal detection theory: From a pool of acceptable description-matched photos, selecting fillers whose appearance is otherwise dissimilar to the suspect should increase the hit rate without affecting the false-alarm rate (increasing discriminability). In Experiment 1, we confirmed this prediction using a standard mock-crime paradigm. In Experiment 2, the effect on discriminability was reversed (as also predicted by the model) when fillers were matched on similarity to the perpetrator in both target-present and target-absent lineups. These findings suggest that signal-detection theory offers a useful theoretical framework for understanding eyewitness identification decisions made from a police lineup.Keywords
Funding Information
- Laura and John Arnold Foundation (8971GA)
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification decisions: A meta-analysis.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2013
- Receiver operating characteristic analysis of eyewitness memory: Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous versus sequential lineups.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2012
- Selection of lineup foils in operational contextsApplied Cognitive Psychology, 2007
- A memory and decision model for eyewitness identificationApplied Cognitive Psychology, 2003
- Calibration and diagnosticity of confidence in eyewitness identification: Comments on what can be inferred from the low confidence–accuracy correlation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1996
- Calibration and diagnosticity of confidence in eyewitness identification: Comments on what can be inferred from the low confidence-accuracy correlation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1996
- Default values in eyewitness descriptions: A problem for the match-to-description lineup foil selection strategy.Law and Human Behavior, 1994
- What do we know about eyewitness identification?American Psychologist, 1993
- The selection of distractors for eyewitness lineups.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993
- Eyewitness identification and the selection of distracters for lineups.Law and Human Behavior, 1991