Personalised support of brain tumour patients during radiotherapy based on psychological profile and quality of life
- 22 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Supportive Care in Cancer
- Vol. 29 (8), 4555-4563
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06000-7
Abstract
Purpose Psychological distress in primary malignant brain tumour (PMBT) patients is associated with poorer outcomes. Radiotherapy (RT) often induces side effects that significantly influence patients’ quality of life (QoL), with potential impact on survival. We evaluated distress, anxiety, depression, and QoL over time to identify patients with difficulties in these areas who required more intense psychological support. Methods Psychological questionnaires—Distress Thermometer (DT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G and FACT-Br)—were completed at the beginning (T0), in the middle (T1), directly after RT (T2), and 3 months after RT (T3). We personalised the psychological support provided for each patient with a minimum of three sessions (‘typical’ schedule) and a maximum of eight sessions (‘intensive’ schedule), depending on the patients’ psychological profiles, clinical evaluations, and requests. Patients’ survival was evaluated in the glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients, with an explorative intent. Results Fifty-nine consecutive PMBT patients receiving post-operative RT were included. For patients who were reported as ‘not distressed’ at T0, no statistically significant changes were noted. In contrast, patients who were ‘distressed’ at T0 showed statistically significant improvements in DT, HADS, FACT-G, and FACT-Br scores over time. ‘Not distressed’ patients required less psychological sessions over the study duration than ‘distressed’ patients. Interestingly, ‘not distressed’ GBM patients survived longer than ‘distressed’ GBM patients. Conclusions Increased psychological support improved distress, mood, and QoL for patients identified as ‘distressed’, whereas psychological well-being was maintained with typical psychological support in patients who were identified as being ‘not distressed’. These results encourage a standardisation of psychological support for all RT patients.This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Radiation-induced brain injury: A reviewFrontiers in Oncology, 2012
- Needs for everyday life support for brain tumour patients' relatives: systematic literature reviewEuropean Journal of Cancer Care, 2010
- Updated Response Assessment Criteria for High-Grade Gliomas: Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Screening for distress in patients with brain cancer using the NCCN's rapid screening measurePsycho‐Oncology, 2007
- The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB): normative values in an Italian population sampleNeurological Sciences, 2005
- Radiotherapy plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for GlioblastomaThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Screening for anxiety and depression in cancer patients: the effects of disease and treatmentEuropean Journal of Cancer, 1994
- The Factor Structure and Factor Stability of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in Patients with CancerThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1991
- The Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1983
- “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinicianJournal of Psychiatric Research, 1975