Is the tobacco ‘footfall’ argument justified for tobacco purchases in New Zealand convenience stores?
- 3 December 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Tobacco Control
- Vol. 31 (3), 438-443
- https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056032
Abstract
Introduction New Zealand’s Smokefree 2025 goal aims to greatly decrease the availability of tobacco. One option is to cease the sale of tobacco from convenience stores. However, tobacco companies and retail trade associations oppose this move and have argued that customers who purchase tobacco drive footfall and spend more than non-tobacco customers. The aim of this study is to test the validity of industry claims about the importance of tobacco to convenience stores. Methods During November and December 2019, immediate postpurchase surveys were undertaken with customers on exit from a random sample of 100 convenience stores in two New Zealand cities. We estimated the mean number of items purchased, including tobacco and non-tobacco items, and mean expenditure on non-tobacco items. Results Of the 3399 transactions recorded, 13.8% included tobacco, of which 8.3% comprised tobacco only and 5.5% included tobacco and non-tobacco items. The mean number of transactions containing both tobacco and non-tobacco items was 1.98, and 1.87 for those containing non-tobacco items only. Customers who purchased tobacco and non-tobacco items spent on average NZ$6.99 on non-tobacco items, whereas customers who purchased non-tobacco items only, spent on average NZ$5.07. Conclusions Our results do not support claims that tobacco drives one-quarter of footfall into stores or that customers who purchase tobacco spend almost twice as much as non-tobacco customers. Combined purchases of tobacco and non-tobacco items constituted 5.5% of transactions; the impact on a store’s profitability of removing tobacco sales is unknown and could be the focus of future research.Keywords
Funding Information
- Lottery Health Research (R-LHR-2019-101847)
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regulating the sale of tobacco in New Zealand: A qualitative analysis of retailers’ views and implications for advocacyInternational Journal of Drug Policy, 2015
- Theoretical impacts of a range of major tobacco retail outlet reduction interventions: modelling results in a country with a smoke-free nation goalTobacco Control, 2014
- “People over Profits”: Retailers Who Voluntarily Ended Tobacco SalesPLOS ONE, 2014
- The Economics of Tobacco in Lebanon: An Estimation of the Social Costs of Tobacco ConsumptionSubstance Use & Misuse, 2013
- Unplanned cigarette purchases and tobacco point of sale advertising: a potential barrier to smoking cessationTobacco Control, 2012
- Why California retailers stop selling tobacco products, and what their customers and employees think about it when they do: case studiesBMC Public Health, 2011
- The effect of retail cigarette pack displays on unplanned purchases: results from immediate postpurchase interviewsTobacco Control, 2009
- Is adolescent smoking related to the density and proximity of tobacco outlets and retail cigarette advertising near schools?Preventive Medicine, 2008
- Tobacco point-of-purchase promotion: examining tobacco industry documentsTobacco Control, 2006
- Retail trade incentives: how tobacco industry practices compare with those of other industries.American Journal of Public Health, 1999