Feasibility testing of a community dialogue approach for promoting the uptake of family planning and contraceptive services in Zambia
Open Access
- 8 August 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 20 (1), 1-12
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05589-5
Abstract
BackgroundCommunity dialogues have been used in participatory approaches in various health prevention and awareness programs, including family planning interventions, to increase understanding and alignment of particular issues from different peoples' perspectives. The main objective of this paper is to document the feasibility of a community dialogue approach, which aimed to promote dialogue between healthcare providers and community members. The feasibility testing was part of formative-phase research needed to design an intervention, with the ultimate goal of increasing the uptake of family planning and contraception. The community dialogue intervention generated discussions on key approaches to improve family planning and contraception provision and uptake.MethodsKey stages of the community dialogue were undertaken, with representation from healthcare providers and community members. Participants included frontline and managerial health care providers, community health workers, family planning and contraception users, the youth, other stakeholders from the education sector, and civil society. How the dialogue was implemented (operational feasibility) as well as the cultural feasibility of the community dialogue content was evaluated through participant observations during the dialogue, using a standardised feasibility testing tick-list, and through focus group discussions with the stakeholders who participated in the community dialogue.ResultsOverall, 21 of the 30 invited participants attended the meeting- 70% attendance. The approach facilitated discussions on how quality care could be achieved in family planning and contraception provision, guided by the ground rules that were agreed upon by the different stakeholders. A need for more time for the discussion was noted. Participants also noted the need for more balanced representation from adolescents as well as other family planning stakeholders, such as community members, especially in comparison to healthcare providers. Some participants were not comfortable with the language used. Young people felt older participants used complicated terminologies while community members felt the health care providers outnumbered them, in terms of representation.ConclusionGenerally, the community dialogue was well received by the community members and the healthcare providers, as was observed from the sentiments expressed by both categories. Some key considerations for refining the approach included soliciting maximum participation from otherwise marginalized groups like the youth would provide stronger representation.Keywords
Other Versions
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- The role of community conversations in facilitating local HIV competence: case study from rural ZimbabweBMC Public Health, 2013
- A commentary on studies presenting projections of the future prevalence of dementiaBMC Public Health, 2013
- The Effect of Community-Based Reproductive Health Communication Interventions on Contraceptive Use Among Young Married Couples in Bihar, IndiaInternational Family Planning Perspectives, 2008
- The benefits of participatory methodologies to develop effective community dialogue in the context of a microbicide trial feasibility study in Mwanza, TanzaniaBMC Public Health, 2007
- Role-playing simulation as a communication tool in community dialogue: Karkonosze Mountains case studySimulation & Gaming, 2007
- Identifying Rural Health Care Needs Using Community ConversationsThe Journal of Rural Health, 2007
- Inupiat youth suicide and culture loss: Changing community conversations for preventionSocial Science & Medicine, 2006
- Using thematic analysis in psychologyQualitative Research in Psychology, 2006
- Gray and GayJournal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 2004
- Extending the Theory of the Coordinated Management of Meaning (CMM) Through a Community Dialogue ProcessCommunication Theory, 2000