How to use imperfect tests for COVID‐19 (SARS‐CoV‐2) to make clinical decisions
Open Access
- 7 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by AMPCo in The Medical Journal of Australia
- Vol. 214 (2), 69-+
- https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50907
Abstract
Click on the article title to read more.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Health and Medical Research Council (1174523)
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- False-negative results of initial RT-PCR assays for COVID-19: A systematic reviewPLOS ONE, 2020
- False Negative Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Infection - Challenges and ImplicationsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 CasesRadiology, 2020
- Testing COVID-19 tests faces methodological challengesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2020
- Rates of Co-infection Between SARS-CoV-2 and Other Respiratory PathogensJAMA, 2020
- Interpreting a covid-19 test resultBMJ, 2020
- Test accuracy and potential sources of bias in diagnostic test evaluationThe Medical Journal of Australia, 2019
- Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratiosBMJ, 2004
- Users' Guides to the Medical LiteratureJAMA, 1994
- Nomogram for Bayes's TheoremThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1975