A Brief Sketch of Hybrid Peacebuilding
Open Access
- 7 April 2021
- book chapter
- other
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Abstract
This opening literature review connects hybrid calls and criticisms to the development of peacebuilding debates at large. First, it briefly presents some of peacebuilding’s ontological aspects, as they may be found both in academia and practice. With such a contrasting framework at hand, the following section explains some core arguments in the existing literature in favour of adopting hybrid peacebuilding. Lastly, voices are raised to show how hybridity has been criticised both within its own circles and by others. Showcasing the various aspects of peacebuilding, and hybridity specifically, this chapter sets the stage for a new set of discussions in the subsequent chapters.Keywords
Funding Information
- Waseda University
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding Peacebuilding as Essentially LocalStability: International Journal of Security and Development, 2013
- A Conceptual Unpacking of Hybridity: Accounting for Notions of Power, Politics and Progress in Analyses of Aid-Driven InterfacesJournal of Peacebuilding & Development, 2012
- Hybridity in Peacebuilding and Development: An IntroductionJournal of Peacebuilding & Development, 2012
- A liberal-local hybrid peace project in action? The increasing engagement between the local and liberal in Timor-LesteReview of International Studies, 2012
- What happened to the Washington Consensus? The evolution of international development policyThe Journal of Socio-Economics, 2009
- State Building Reconsidered: the Role of Hybridity in the Formation of Political OrderPolitical Science, 2007
- Peacebuilding and the Limits of Liberal InternationalismInternational Security, 1997
- Cultural ViolenceJournal of Peace Research, 1990
- Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial DiscoursesFeminist Review, 1988
- Violence, Peace, and Peace ResearchJournal of Peace Research, 1969