Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study
Open Access
- 1 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Thoracic Society in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 201 (7), 789-798
- https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201905-0917oc
Abstract
Rationale: Although proposed as a clinical prompt to sepsis based on predictive validity for mortality, the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score is often used as a screening tool, which requires high sensitivity. Objectives: To assess the predictive accuracy of qSOFA for mortality in Brazil, focusing on sensitivity. Methods: We prospectively collected data from two cohorts of emergency department and ward patients. Cohort 1 included patients with suspected infection but without organ dysfunction or sepsis (22 hospitals: 3 public and 19 private). Cohort 2 included patients with sepsis (54 hospitals: 24 public and 28 private). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The predictive accuracy of qSOFA was examined considering only the worst values before the suspicion of infection or sepsis. Measurements and Main Results: Cohort 1 contained 5,460 patients (mortality rate, 14.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 13.1–15.0), among whom 78.3% had a qSOFA score less than or equal to 1 (mortality rate, 8.3%; 95% CI, 7.5–9.1). The sensitivity of a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 2 for predicting mortality was 53.9% and the 95% CI was 50.3 to 57.5. The sensitivity was higher for a qSOFA greater than or equal to 1 (84.9%; 95% CI, 82.1–87.3), a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 1 or lactate greater than 2 mmol/L (91.3%; 95% CI, 89.0–93.2), and systemic inflammatory response syndrome plus organ dysfunction (68.7%; 95% CI, 65.2–71.9). Cohort 2 contained 4,711 patients, among whom 62.3% had a qSOFA score less than or equal to 1 (mortality rate, 17.3%; 95% CI, 15.9–18.7), whereas in public hospitals the mortality rate was 39.3% (95% CI, 35.5–43.3). Conclusions: A qSOFA score greater than or equal to 2 has low sensitivity for predicting death in patients with suspected infection in a developing country. Using a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 2 as a screening tool for sepsis may miss patients who ultimately die. Using a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 1 or adding lactate to a qSOFA score greater than or equal to 1 may improve sensitivity. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03158493).This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- qSOFA does not replace SIRS in the definition of sepsisCritical Care, 2016
- Use of CRB-65 and quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment to predict site of care and mortality in pneumonia patients in the emergency department: a retrospective studyCritical Care, 2016
- New Sepsis CriteriaSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2016
- Assessment of Clinical Criteria for SepsisJAMA, 2016
- The Global Epidemiology of Sepsis. Does It Matter That We Know So Little?American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2016
- Assessment of Global Incidence and Mortality of Hospital-treated Sepsis. Current Estimates and LimitationsAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2016
- Epidemiology and Outcome of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock in Intensive Care Units in Mainland ChinaPLOS ONE, 2014
- Mortality Related to Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Among Critically Ill Patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012JAMA, 2014
- Accurate and Economical Detection of ALK Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma with Semiquantitative Immunohistochemical ScreeningPLOS ONE, 2014