Vaccine-hesitant individuals accumulate additional COVID-19 risk due to divergent perception and behaviors related to SARS-CoV-2 testing – a population based, cross-sectional study
Preprint
- 13 September 2022
- preprint
- Published by Research Square Platform LLC
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the perception of SARS-CoV-2 detection methods, information sources, and opinions on appropriate behavior after receiving negative or positive test results. Methods In a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study conducted between September 1 and November 17, 2021, epidemiological, behavioral, and COVID-19-related data was acquired from the public in Munich, Germany. Results Most of the 1,388 participants obtained information from online media (82.8%) as well as state and federal authorities (80.3%). 93.4% believed in the accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing and 41.2% in the accuracy of rapid antigen tests (RATs). However, RATs were preferred for testing (59.1%) over PCR (51.1%). 24.0 % of all individuals were willing to ignore hygiene measures and 76.9% were less afraid of SARS-CoV-2 transmission after receiving a negative PCR test (5.9% and 48.8% in case of a negative RAT). 28.8% reported not to self-isolate after receiving a positive RAT. Multivariate analyses revealed that non-vaccinated individuals relied less on information from governmental authorities (p=0.0004) and more on social media (p=0.0216), disbelieved in the accuracy of the PCR test (p≤0.0001) while displaying strong preference towards using RATs (p≤0.0001), were more willing to abandon pandemic-related hygiene measures (p≤0.0001), less afraid of transmitting SARS-CoV-2 after a negative RAT (p≤0.0001), and less likely to isolate after a positive RAT (p≤0.0001). Conclusion Insights into preferred information sources as well as perception, preferences and behavior related to SARS-CoV-2 testing and hygiene measures are key to refining public health information and surveillance campaigns. Non-vaccinated individuals’ divergent believes and behaviors possibly increase their COVID-19 risk.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Detection and viral RNA shedding of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory specimens relative to symptom onset among COVID-19 patients in Bavaria, Germany.Epidemiology and Infection, 2021
- COVID-19-related stigma and its sociodemographic correlates: a comparative studyGlobalization and Health, 2021
- Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infectionEmergencias, 2021
- Evaluation of two rapid antigen tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 in a hospital settingMedical Microbiology and Immunology, 2021
- Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 VaccineThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- COVID-19–Related Infodemic and Its Impact on Public Health: A Global Social Media AnalysisThe American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2020
- Analytical sensitivity and efficiency comparisons of SARS-CoV-2 RT–qPCR primer–probe setsNature Microbiology, 2020
- Digital Mis/Disinformation and Public Engagment with Health and Science Controversies: Fresh Perspectives from Covid-19Media and Communication, 2020
- Multicentre comparison of quantitative PCR-based assays to detect SARS-CoV-2, Germany, March 2020Eurosurveillance, 2020
- Science audiences, misinformation, and fake newsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019