Death is different: Reply to Olver et al. (2020).
- 1 November 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
- Vol. 26 (4), 511-518
- https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000285
Abstract
In our "Statement of Concerned Experts on the Use of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised [PCL-R] in Capital Sentencing to Assess Risk for Institutional Violence," DeMatteo et al. (2020) summarized the relevant empirical research and concluded that the PCL-R cannot and should not be used to make predictions that an individual will engage in serious institutional violence with any reasonable degree of precision or accuracy in the context of capital sentencing decisions. In a solicited commentary, Olver et al. (2020) raised several concerns about our statement and presented new analyses of the research literature. In this reply, we identify crucial points about which Olver et al. disagreed with the statement and, after analyzing their concerns, conclude that their concerns are either (a) based on misunderstanding or mischaracterization of the statement, or (b) irrelevant to the purpose and content of our statement. We also conclude that it is not possible to properly evaluate the new analyses presented by Olver et al. in the absence of full technical detail that would permit adequate peer review.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability ResearchJournal of Chiropractic Medicine, 2016
- Wasted resources and gratuitous suffering: The failure of a security rationale for death row.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2016
- Adversarial Allegiance among Expert WitnessesAnnual Review of Law and Social Science, 2015
- Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them?Psychological Science, 2013
- Probability of Criminal Acts of Violence: A Test of Jury Predictive AccuracyBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 2013
- Community violence to prison assault: A test of the behavioral continuity hypothesis.Law and Human Behavior, 2012
- Life and death in the lone star state: Three decades of violence predictions by capital juriesBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 2010
- Capital jury decision-making: The limitations of predictions of future violence.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2009
- Conviction Offense and Prison ViolenceCrime & Delinquency, 2008
- Predictions of Future Dangerousness in Capital Murder Trials: Is It Time to "Disinvent the Wheel?"Law and Human Behavior, 2005