The effect of vacuum: an emerging experimental parameter to consider during headspace microextraction sampling
- 1 September 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
- Vol. 412 (24), 5989-5997
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-02738-x
Abstract
The effect of vacuum is an emerging experimental parameter to consider during optimization of a variety of headspace microextraction methodologies. The positive effect of vacuum was initially demonstrated for headspace solid-phase microextraction and was recently expanded to single-drop microextraction and higher capacity sorbents i.e. stir bar sorptive extraction. In all cases, sampling under vacuum greatly accelerated the extraction kinetics of analytes exhibiting long equilibration times under atmospheric pressure. At the same time, the extraction of analytes that reached equilibrium fast was not affected. In all optimized methods, extraction times were greatly reduced and/or sampling temperatures were lower to those reported with the standard methodology under atmospheric pressure. This work succinctly overviews the effect of vacuum on the different headspace microextraction technologies reported so far. The fundamental concepts describing the pressure dependence of each methodology are pulled together and presented in a simplified manner. The latest findings on the combined effects of vacuum and several selected experimental parameters typically examined during method optimization are then presented and the practical aspects of past outcomes are highlighted. The discussion also includes the air-evacuation step and the analysis of complex matrices. This article is intended for readers who are either new to the field of vacuum headspace microextraction sampling or its use and want to exploit this powerful approach.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recovery of phosphonate surface contaminants from glass using a simple vacuum extractor with a solid-phase microextraction fiberAnalytica Chimica Acta, 2011
- Protocol for solid-phase microextraction method developmentNature Protocols, 2010
- Interactions between Wine Volatile Compounds and Grape and Wine Matrix Components Influence Aroma Compound Headspace PartitioningJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2009
- Steady-state kinetic model for headspace solvent microextractionJournal of Chromatography A, 2008
- Matrix effect during the application of a rapid method using HS-SPME followed by GC–ECD for the analysis of 2,4,6-TCA in wine and cork soaksFood Chemistry, 2007
- Development of headspace solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography–mass spectrometry methodology for analysis of terpenoids in Madeira winesAnalytica Chimica Acta, 2005
- Developments in liquid-phase microextractionTrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2003
- The effects of temperature and pressure on the performance of Carboxen/PDMS fibres during solid phase microextraction (SPME) of headspace volatiles from cooked and raw turkey breastFlavour and Fragrance Journal, 2001
- Effect of Sample Volume on Quantitative Analysis by Solid-phase MicroextractionPart 1. Theoretical ConsiderationsThe Analyst, 1997
- Solvent Microextraction into a Single DropAnalytical Chemistry, 1996