Enhancing Specific Health Literacy with a Digital Evidence-Based Patient Decision Aid for Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Open Access
- 1 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Patient Preference and Adherence
- Vol. ume 15, 1269-1279
- https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s311470
Abstract
Introduction: Health literacy is an important competency to make informed, shared decisions in line with patient’s preferences. On the other hand, lower health literacy is associated with poorer health outcomes. Evidence-based patient decision aids (EbPDA) are validated instruments to support informed medical decisions and empower patients for relevant involvement in their care. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a digital EbPDA for hypertension on health literacy. Methods: In a randomized controlled trial, 124 participants were presented with a web-based scenario related to a newly diagnosed condition of arterial hypertension. The intervention group was provided with an online decision aid, while the control group was prompted to search for related information without support. Specific health literacy for hypertension was operationalized based on the European survey for health literacy (HLS-EU-Q47). Results: The intervention group showed a statistically significant increase in subjectively perceived overall specific health literacy regarding hypertension (p=0.02, Cohen’s d=0.44). The effect was also statistically significant for the subcategories understanding, appraising, and applying health-related information (all p< 0.05). At least equal results could be shown for participants with a lower level of education compared to participants with a high level. Conclusion: The findings suggest that digital EbPDAs can be an effective and easily scalable instrument to improve populations’ specific health literacy. A possible advantage of the measure could be that patients are addressed concerning important and pressing personal decisions, fostering awareness of the individual’s need for health literacy to reflect one’s options and preferences. EbPDAs may also be a promising approach to target vulnerable populations, as the investigated EbPDA seems to perform equally in less versus more educated individuals. For future research, it may be interesting to investigate whether EbPDAs have effects on general health literacy that go beyond the disease specifically addressed.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Health Literacy and Shared Decision-making: Exploring the Relationship to Enable Meaningful Patient Engagement in HealthcareJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2021
- What makes a patient ready for Shared Decision Making? A qualitative studyPatient Education and Counseling, 2020
- Factors Influencing Implementation Of Shared Medical Decision Making In Patients With CancerPatient Preference and Adherence, 2019
- Multiple health literacy dimensions are associated with physicians’ efforts to achieve shared decision-makingPatient Education and Counseling, 2019
- Health Literacy and Health-Care Engagement as Predictors of Shared Decision-Making Among Adult Information Seekers in the USA: a Secondary Data Analysis of the Health Information National Trends SurveyJournal of Cancer Education, 2018
- The Impact of Patient Participation in Health Decisions Within Medical EncountersMedical Decision Making, 2015
- Assessment of Patient Empowerment - A Systematic Review of MeasuresPLOS ONE, 2015
- Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcareBMJ, 2012
- Patient health literacy and participation in the health‐care processHealth Expectations, 2008
- Health Literacy: Essential for Health CommunicationJournal of Health Communication, 2003