Personal protective equipment and evidence‐based advice for surgical departments during COVID‐19
- 15 July 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Anz Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 90 (9), 1566-1572
- https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.16194
Abstract
Background Inconsistencies regarding the use of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) have raised concerns for the safety of surgical staff during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. This rapid review synthesises the literature that includes input from clinical experts to provide evidence‐based guidance for surgical services. Methods The rapid review comprised of targeted searches in PubMed and grey literature. Pertinent findings were discussed by a working group of clinical experts, and consensus recommendations, consistent with Australian and New Zealand Government guidelines, were formulated. Results There was a paucity of high‐quality primary studies specifically investigating appropriate surgical PPE for healthcare workers treating patients possibly infected with COVID‐19. SARS‐CoV‐2 is capable of aerosol, droplet and fomite transmission, making it essential to augment standard infection control measures with appropriate PPE, especially during surgical emergencies and aerosol‐generating procedures. All biological material should be treated a potential source of SARS‐COV‐2. Staff must have formal training in the use of PPE and should be supervised by a colleague during donning and doffing. Patients with suspected or confirmed COVID‐19 should wear a surgical mask during transfer to and from theatre. Potential solutions exist in the literature to extend the use of surgical P2/N95 respirators in situations of limited supply. Conclusion PPE is advised for all high‐risk procedures and when a patient’s COVID‐19 status is unknown. Surgical departments should facilitate staggered rostering, remote meeting attendance, and self‐isolation of symptomatic staff. Vulnerable surgical staff should be identified and excluded from operations with a high risk of COVID‐19 infection.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approachSystematic Reviews, 2012
- A method for evaluating health care workers’ personal protective equipment techniqueAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2011
- A cluster randomized clinical trial comparing fit-tested and non-fit-tested N95 respirators to medical masks to prevent respiratory virus infection in health care workersInfluenza and Other Respiratory Viruses, 2011
- Development of a Test System To Evaluate Procedures for Decontamination of Respirators Containing Viral DropletsApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2009
- Large Particle Penetration through N95 Respirator Filters and Facepiece Leaks with Cyclic FlowThe Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 2009
- RAPID VERSUS FULL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: VALIDITY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE?Anz Journal of Surgery, 2008
- Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: An inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessmentInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2008
- 2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care SettingsAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2007
- Risk of Exposure of Surgical Personnel to Patients' Blood during Surgery at San Francisco General HospitalThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Facial Hair and Respirator Fit: A Review of the LiteratureAihaj Journal, 1988