Alternative transcripts in variant interpretation: the potential for missed diagnoses and misdiagnoses
- 5 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Genetics in Medicine
- Vol. 22 (7), 1269-1275
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-020-0781-x
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- National Institutes of Health (U01HG007672)
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pitfalls of clinical exome and gene panel testing: alternative transcriptsGenetics in Medicine, 2019
- A comprehensive iterative approach is highly effective in diagnosing individuals who are exome negativeGenetics in Medicine, 2019
- The Importance of Biologic Knowledge and Gene Expression Context for Genomic Data InterpretationFrontiers in Genetics, 2018
- Alternative splicing as a regulator of development and tissue identityNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2017
- Characterisation of CDKL5 Transcript Isoforms in Human and MousePLOS ONE, 2016
- Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular PathologyGenetics in Medicine, 2015
- Choice of transcripts and software has a large effect on variant annotationGenome Medicine, 2014
- A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing dataNature Genetics, 2011
- Deep surveying of alternative splicing complexity in the human transcriptome by high-throughput sequencingNature Genetics, 2008
- CDKL5 mutations cause infantile spasms, early onset seizures, and severe mental retardation in female patientsJournal of Medical Genetics, 2006