Impact of the LACC study. A SFOG survey
- 1 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Bulletin du Cancer
- Vol. 107 (5), 551-555
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.02.012
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancerAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2019
- Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer patients without adjuvant treatment: Ancillary analysis of a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (KGOG 1028)Gynecologic Oncology, 2019
- Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical CancerThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2018
- Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical CancerThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2018
- Hysterectomy for benign disease: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Obstetrics and GynecologyEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2016
- Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage cervical cancerBMC Cancer, 2015
- Artefactual displacement of cervical epithelium showing CIN III to fallopian tubes during laparoscopic hysterectomy with intrauterine balloon manipulatorHistopathology, 2014
- Effects of a Simulated CO2 Pneumoperitoneum Environment on the Proliferation, Apoptosis, and Metastasis of Cervical Cancer Cells In VitroMedical Science Monitor, 2014
- Does a uterine manipulator affect cervical cancer pathology or identification of lymphovascular space involvement?Gynecologic Oncology, 2012
- Laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy—a randomised phase II trial: perioperative outcomes and surgicopathological measurementsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2010