Flexible versus structured support for reasoning: enhancing analytical reasoning through a flexible analytic technique
- 23 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Intelligence and National Security
- Vol. 36 (2), 279-298
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2020.1841466
Abstract
Structured analytic techniques (SATs) help the intelligence community reduce flaws in cognition that lead to faulty reasoning. To ascertain whether SATs provide benefits to reasoning we conducted an experiment within a web-based application, comparing three conditions: 1) unaided reasoning, 2) a prototypical order-based SAT and 3) a flexible, process-based SAT that we call TRACE. Our findings suggest that the more flexible SAT generated higher quality reasoning compared to the other conditions. Consequently, techniques and training that support flexible analytical processes rather than those that require a set sequence of steps may be more beneficial to intelligence analysis and complex reasoning. Keywords: structured analytical techniques, Analysis of Competing Hypotheses, tradecraft, cognitive biases, experiments.This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effectiveness of a single intervention of computer‐aided argument mapping in a marketing and a financial accounting subjectHigher Education Research & Development, 2011
- Transforming Analysis: The Intelligence Community's Best Kept SecretIntelligence and National Security, 2011
- Cognitive Predispositions and Intelligence Analyst ReasoningInternational Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 2010
- Development and Validation of the Short Grit Scale (Grit–S)Journal of Personality Assessment, 2009
- Richard H. Thaler, Cass R. Sunstein, Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happinessConstitutional Political Economy, 2008
- Supporting Annotation as a Scholarly Tool--Experiences From the Online Chopin Variorum EditionLiterary and Linguistic Computing, 2006
- Araucaria as a Tool for Diagramming Arguments in Teaching and Studying PhilosophyTeaching Philosophy, 2006
- Argument Maps Improve Critical ThinkingTeaching Philosophy, 2004
- Information and Persuasion: Rivals or Partners?Design Issues, 2000
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience, 1974