Reply to Peçanha Antonio et al.: Too Many Calories for All?
Open Access
- 1 October 2020
- journal article
- letter
- Published by American Thoracic Society in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 202 (7), 1060
- https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202005-1810le
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcomes Six Months after Delivering 100% or 70% of Enteral Calorie Requirements during Critical Illness (TARGET). A Randomized Controlled TrialAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2020
- Energy-Dense versus Routine Enteral Nutrition in the Critically IllThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2018
- Early goal-directed nutrition versus standard of care in adult intensive care patients: the single-centre, randomised, outcome assessor-blinded EAT-ICU trialIntensive Care Medicine, 2017
- Permissive Underfeeding or Standard Enteral Feeding in Critically Ill AdultsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Initial Trophic vs Full Enteral Feeding in Patients With Acute Lung Injury: The EDEN Randomized TrialJAMA, 2012
- GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidenceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011