Characterizing off-target corticospinal responses to double-cone transcranial magnetic stimulation
- 6 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Experimental Brain Research
- Vol. 239 (4), 1099-1110
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06044-5
Abstract
Introduction The double-cone coil (D-CONE) is frequently used in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) experiments that target the motor cortex (M1) lower-limb representation. Anecdotal evidence and modeling studies have shed light on the off-target effects of D-CONE TMS but the physiological extent remains undetermined. Purpose To characterize the off-target effects of D-CONE TMS based on bilateral corticospinal responses in the legs and hands. Methods Thirty (N = 30) participants (9 women, age: 26 ± 5yrs) completed a stimulus–response curve procedure with D-CONE TMS applied to the dominant vastus lateralis (cVL) and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded in each active VL and resting first dorsal interosseous (FDI). As a positive control (CON), the dominant FDI was directly targeted with a figure-of-eight coil and MEPs were similarly recorded in each active FDI and resting VL. MEPMAX, V50 and MEP latencies were compared with repeated-measures ANOVAs or mixed-effects analysis and Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons. Results Off-target responses were evident in all muscles, with similar MEPMAX in the target (cVL) and off-target (iVL) leg (p = 0.99) and cFDI compared with CON (p = 0.99). cFDI and CON MEPMAX were greater than iFDI (p < 0.01). A main effect of target (p < 0.001) indicated that latencies were shorter with CON but similar in all muscles with D-CONE. Discussion Concurrent MEP recordings in bilateral upper- and lower-extremity muscles confirm that lower-limb D-CONE TMS produces substantial distance-dependent off-target effects. In addition to monitoring corticospinal responses in off-target muscles to improve targeting accuracy in real-time, future studies may incorporate off-target information into statistical models post-hoc.Funding Information
- U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-16-PHTBIRP-CR3A)
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electric field depth–focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: Simulation comparison of 50 coil designsBrain Stimulation, 2013
- Dorsolateral prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortex interactions during self-control of cigarette cravingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013
- Multimodal transcranial magnetic stimulation: Using concurrent neuroimaging to reveal the neural network dynamics of noninvasive brain stimulationProgress in Neurobiology, 2011
- How does transcranial magnetic stimulation modify neuronal activity in the brain? Implications for studies of cognitionCortex, 2009
- Comparison of navigated and non-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor cortex mapping, motor threshold and motor evoked potentialsNeuroImage, 2009
- Exploring the physiological effects of double‐cone coil TMS over the medial frontal cortex on the anterior cingulate cortex: an H215O PET studyEuropean Journal of Neuroscience, 2007
- Theta Burst Stimulation of the Human Motor CortexNeuron, 2005
- The cortical silent period: intrinsic variability and relation to the waveform of the transcranial magnetic stimulation pulseClinical Neurophysiology, 2004
- The physiological basis of transcranial motor cortex stimulation in conscious humansClinical Neurophysiology, 2004
- Effects of voluntary contraction on descending volleys evoked by transcranial stimulation in conscious humansJournal Of Physiology-London, 1998