Preserving 40% forest cover is a valuable and well‐supported conservation guideline: reply to Banks‐Leite et al
- 4 February 2021
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Wiley in Ecology Letters
- Vol. 24 (5), 1114-1116
- https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13689
Abstract
Banks‐Leite et al. (2021) claim that our suggestion of preserving ≥ 40% forest cover lacks evidence and can be problematic. We find these claims unfounded, and discuss why conservation planning urgently requires valuable, well‐supported and feasible general guidelines like the 40% criterion. Using region‐specific thresholds worldwide is unfeasible and potentially harmful.Keywords
Funding Information
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (grant number 312178/2019‐0)
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The suggestion that landscapes should contain 40% of forest cover lacks evidence and is problematicEcology Letters, 2021
- Biodiversity scientists must fight the creeping rise of extinction denialNature Ecology & Evolution, 2020
- Designing optimal human‐modified landscapes for forest biodiversity conservationEcology Letters, 2020
- Thresholds in forest bird communities along woody vegetation gradients in the South American Dry ChacoJournal of Applied Ecology, 2019
- A review of threshold responses of birds to landscape changes across the worldJournal of Field Ornithology, 2018
- An Ecoregion-Based Approach to Protecting Half the Terrestrial RealmBioScience, 2017
- Rapid Assessment of Ecosystem Service Co-Benefits of Biodiversity Priority Areas in MadagascarPLOS ONE, 2016
- Birds in Anthropogenic Landscapes: The Responses of Ecological Groups to Forest Loss in the Brazilian Atlantic ForestPLOS ONE, 2015
- Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs and benefits of set-asides in a biodiversity hotspotScience, 2014
- Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Birds and Mammals in Landscapes with Different Proportions of Suitable Habitat: A ReviewOikos, 1994