Factors Associated with Increased Risk of Patient No-Show in Telehealth and Traditional Surgery Clinics
- 2 September 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 231 (6), 695-702
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.08.760
Abstract
Background With the growing use of telehealth, understanding factors affecting patient follow-up in traditional and telehealth settings is important. Few data exist examining the use of telehealth compared with traditional settings. Bridging this gap is critical to optimizing telehealth use and reducing barriers. Study Design This is a retrospective cohort study of return and postoperative (electronic video [eClinic] and traditional) visits from January 2018 to March 2020 at single tertiary care center. There were 12,359 unique first-encounter patients with 903 eClinic and 11,456 traditional visits; 11,547 patients completed visits, while 812 patients did not show up. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was performed to identify factors associated with no-show. County-level mapping was used to identify patterns in no-show rates. Results Patients from the eClinic had twice the odds of no-show compared with those from a traditional clinic (p < 0.001). Age was inversely proportional to odds of no-show, with each additional decade associated with a 16% decrease in these odds (p < 0.001). African-American patients had greater odds of no-show compared to Caucasian patients (odds ratio [OR] 2.47; 95% CI 1.95–3.13, p < 0.001). Marital statuses of single and legal separation were associated with higher odds of no-show compared with married marital status (p < 0.001 and p = 0.04, respectively). Minimally invasive and endocrine surgery clinics had lower odds of no-show compared with acute care surgery clinic (p < 0.001 for both). County-level no-show rates demonstrate similar patterns between clinic settings. Conclusions Several factors are associated with increased odds of no-show, including the visit being in eClinic. County-level analysis suggests no-show variation is not dependent on geographic location. Understanding these patterns allows for prospective identification of barriers and development of interventions to optimize access and patient care.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors Associated with Appointment Non-Adherence among African-Americans with Severe, Poorly Controlled HypertensionPLOS ONE, 2014
- Utility of routine postoperative visit after appendectomy and cholecystectomy with evaluation of mobile technology access in an urban safety net populationJournal of Surgical Research, 2014
- Spousal social support and strain: impacts on health in older couplesJournal of Behavioral Medicine, 2014
- Mobile Health Medication Adherence and Blood Pressure Control in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Proof-of-Concept Randomized Controlled TrialJMIR Research Protocols, 2013
- How Do Low-Income Urban African Americans and Latinos Feel about Telemedicine? A Diffusion of Innovation AnalysisInternational Journal of Telemedicine and Applications, 2012
- Bariatric surgery using a network and teleconferencing to serve remote patients in the Veterans Administration Health Care System: feasibility and resultsThe American Journal of Surgery, 2011
- Automated Symptom Alerts Reduce Postoperative Symptom Severity After Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2011
- One hundred years of telemedicine: does this new technology have a place in paediatrics?Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2006
- Bridging the digital divide: Reaching vulnerable populationsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2004
- Why We Don't Come: Patient Perceptions on No-ShowsAnnals of Family Medicine, 2004