Dissection of synaptic pathways through the CSF biomarkers for predicting Alzheimer disease
- 25 August 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Neurology
- Vol. 95 (8), e953-e961
- https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000010131
Abstract
Objective To assess the ability of a combination of synaptic CSF biomarkers to separate Alzheimer disease (AD) and non-AD disorders and to help in the differential diagnosis between neurocognitive diseases. Methods This was a retrospective cross-sectional monocentric study. All participants explored with CSF assessments for neurocognitive decline were invited to participate. After complete clinical and imaging evaluations, 243 patients were included. CSF synaptic (GAP-43, neurogranin, SNAP-25 total, SNAP-25aa40, synaptotagmin-1) and AD biomarkers were blindly quantified with ELISA or mass spectrometry. Statistical analysis compared CSF levels between the various groups of AD dementias (n = 81), mild cognitive impairment (MCI)–AD (n = 30), other MCI (n = 49), other dementias (OD) (n = 49), and neurologic controls (n = 35) and their discriminatory powers. Results All synaptic biomarkers were significantly increased in patients with MCI-AD and AD-dementia compared to the other groups. All synaptic biomarkers could efficiently discriminate AD dementias from OD (AUC ≥0.80). All but synaptotagmin were also able to discriminate patients with MCI-AD from controls (area under the curve [AUC] ≥0.85) and those with AD dementias from controls (AUC ≥0.80). Overall, CSF SNAP-25aa40 had the highest discriminative power (AUC 0.93 between patients with AD dementias and controls or OD, AUC 0.90 between those with MCI-AD and controls). Higher levels were associated with 2 alleles of APOE ε4. Conclusion All synaptic biomarkers tested had a good discriminatory power to distinguish patients with AD abnormal CSF from those with non-AD disorders. SNAP25aa40 demonstrated the highest power to discriminate AD CSF-positive patients from patients without AD and neurologic controls in this cohort. Classification of evidence This retrospective study provides Class II evidence that CSF synaptic biomarkers discriminate patients with AD from those without AD.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Utility of the Synaptic Marker Neurogranin in Alzheimer DiseaseJAMA Neurology, 2016
- Neurogranin and YKL-40: independent markers of synaptic degeneration and neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s diseaseAlzheimer's Research & Therapy, 2015
- Neurogranin as a Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker for Synaptic Loss in Symptomatic Alzheimer DiseaseJAMA Neurology, 2015
- Cerebrospinal fluid neurogranin: relation to cognition and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s diseaseBrain, 2015
- C‐terminal neurogranin is increased in cerebrospinal fluid but unchanged in plasma in Alzheimer's diseaseAlzheimer's & Dementia, 2015
- Cerebrospinal fluid levels of the synaptic protein neurogranin correlates with cognitive decline in prodromal Alzheimer's diseaseAlzheimer's & Dementia, 2014
- Neurogranin in cerebrospinal fluid as a marker of synaptic degeneration in Alzheimer's diseaseBrain Research, 2010
- Synaptic alterations in CA1 in mild Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairmentNeurology, 2007
- Altered expression of synaptic proteins occurs early during progression of Alzheimer’s diseaseNeurology, 2001
- Physical basis of cognitive alterations in alzheimer's disease: Synapse loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairmentAnnals of Neurology, 1991