Development of a surgical assessment tool for national policy monitoring & evaluation in Ethiopia: A quality improvement study
- 19 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in International Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 80, 231-240
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.025
Abstract
Background: A baseline assessment of surgical capacity is recommended as a first-step to surgical system strengthening in order to inform national policy. In Ethiopia, the World Health Organization’s Tool for Situational Analysis (WHO SAT) was adapted to assess surgical, obstetric, and anesthesia capacity as part of a national initiative: Saving Lives Through Safe Surgery (SaLTS). This study describes the process of adapting this tool and initial results. Materials and Methods The new tool was used to evaluate fourteen hospitals in the Southern Nations, Nationalities, and People’s Region of Ethiopia between February and March 2017. Two analytic methods were employed. To compare this data to international metrics, the WHO Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) framework was used. To assess congruence with national policy, data was evaluated against Ethiopian SaLTS targets. Results: Facilities had on average 62% of SARA items necessary for both basic surgery and comprehensive surgery. Primary, general, and specialized facilities offered on average 84%, 100%, and 100% of SARA basic surgeries, and 58%, 73% and 90% of SARA comprehensive surgeries, respectively. An average of 68% of SaLTS primary surgeries were available at primary facilities, 83% at general facilities, and 100% at specialized facilities. General and specialized hospitals offered an average of 80% of SaLTS general surgeries, while one specialized hospital offered 38% of SaLTS specialized surgeries. Conclusion: While the modified SaLTS Tool provided evaluation against Ethiopian national benchmarks, the resultant assessment was much lengthier than standard international tools. Analysis of results using the SARA framework allowed for comparison to global standards and provided insight into essential parts of the tool. An assessment tool for national surgical policy should maintain internationally comparable metrics and incorporation into existing surveys when possible, while including country-specific targets.Keywords
Funding Information
- GE Foundation
- GE Foundation
- GE Foundation
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mixed-methods assessment of surgical capacity in two regions in EthiopiaBritish Journal of Surgery, 2019
- Bridging the human resource gap in surgical and anesthesia care in low-resource countries: a review of the task sharing literatureHuman Resources for Health, 2017
- Safe Surgery for All: Early Lessons from Implementing a National Government‐Driven Surgical Plan in EthiopiaWorld Journal of Surgery, 2017
- New global surgical and anaesthesia indicators in the World Development Indicators datasetBMJ Global Health, 2017
- Retrospective review of Surgical Availability and Readiness in 8 African countriesBMJ Open, 2017
- SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process: Table 1BMJ Quality & Safety, 2015
- The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery Global surgery 2030: Evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare and economic developmentSurgery, 2015
- Survey of Surgery and Anesthesia Infrastructure in EthiopiaWorld Journal of Surgery, 2012
- Decompressive Craniectomy in Diffuse Traumatic Brain InjuryThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Task shifting and sharing in Tigray, Ethiopia, to achieve comprehensive emergency obstetric careInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2011