Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
Open Access
- 1 July 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Stroke
- Vol. 51 (7), 2066-2075
- https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.120.028825
Abstract
Background and Purpose: The effects of direct oral anticoagulants in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation should be assessed in actual conditions of use. France has near-universal healthcare coverage with a unified healthcare information system, allowing large population-based analyses. NAXOS (Evaluation of Apixaban in Stroke and Systemic Embolism Prevention in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation) aimed to compare the safety, effectiveness, and mortality of apixaban with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), rivaroxaban, and dabigatran, in oral anticoagulant-naive patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Methods: This was an observational study using French National Health System claims data and including all adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who initiated oral anticoagulant between 2014 and 2016. Outcomes of interest were major bleeding events leading to hospitalization (safety), stroke and systemic thromboembolic events (effectiveness), and all-cause mortality. Four approaches were used for comparative analyses: matching on propensity score (PS; 1:n); as a sensitivity analysis, matching on high-dimensional PS; adjustment on PS; and adjustment on known confounders. For each outcome, cumulative incidence rates accounting for competing risks of death were estimated. Results: Overall, 321 501 patients were analyzed, of whom 35.0%, 27.2%, 31.1%, and 6.6% initiated VKAs, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran, respectively. Apixaban was associated with a lower PS–matched risk of major bleeding compared with VKAs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43 [95% CI, 0.40–0.46]) and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.63–0.72]), but not dabigatran (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.81–1.08]). Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of stroke and systemic thromboembolic event compared with VKAs (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.56–0.65]), but not rivaroxaban (HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.97–1.15]) or dabigatran (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.78–1.11]). All-cause mortality was lower with apixaban than with VKAs, but not lower than with rivaroxaban or dabigatran. Conclusions: Apixaban was associated with superior safety, effectiveness, and lower mortality than VKAs; with superior safety than rivaroxaban and similar safety to dabigatran; and with similar effectiveness when compared with rivaroxaban or dabigatran. These observational data suggest potentially important differences in outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants, which should be explored in randomized trials.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2014
- Gastrointestinal bleeding with the new oral anticoagulants – defining the issues and the management strategiesThrombosis and Haemostasis, 2013
- 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillationEuropean Heart Journal, 2012
- Evaluation of risk stratification schemes for ischaemic stroke and bleeding in 182 678 patients with atrial fibrillation: the Swedish Atrial Fibrillation cohort studyEuropean Heart Journal, 2012
- Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial FibrillationThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational StudiesMultivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
- A Tutorial and Case Study in Propensity Score Analysis: An Application to Estimating the Effect of In-Hospital Smoking Cessation Counseling on MortalityMultivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
- External Validity of Clinical Trials in Acute Myocardial InfarctionArchives of Internal Medicine, 2007
- Utilisation et suivi biologique des antivitamines K en pratique médicale courante: Résultats français de l’étude internationale ISAM chez des patients ayant une fibrillation auriculaireLa Presse Médicale, 2006
- External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?”The Lancet, 2005