Astronomische Nachrichten

Journal Information
ISSN / EISSN : 0004-6337 / 1521-3994
Current Publisher: Wiley (10.1002)
Former Publisher:
Total articles ≅ 92,106
Current Coverage
SCOPUS
SCIE
Archived in
SHERPA/ROMEO
EBSCO
Filter:

Latest articles in this journal

, Ashraf Tadross
Published: 7 May 2021
by Wiley
Astronomische Nachrichten; doi:10.1002/asna.202143848

Abstract:
The estimation of the main parameters of star clusters is significant in astrophysical studies. The most important aspect of using the Gaia DR2 survey lies in the positions, parallax, and proper motions of cluster stars with homogeneous photometry that make the membership probability determine with high accuracy. In this respect, depending on Gaia DR2 database, an analysis of the open star cluster Melotte 72 is taking place here. It is located at a distance of 2,345 ± 108 pc with an age of 1.0 ± 0.5 Gyr. In studying the radial density profile, the radius is found to be 5.0 ± 0.15 arcmin. The reddening, the luminosity and mass functions, the total mass of the cluster, and the galactic geometrical distances (X⊙, Y⊙, Z⊙), and the distance from the galactic center (Rg) have been estimated as well. Our study has shown a dynamical relaxation behavior of Melotte 72.
, Dagmar L. Neuhäuser
Published: 5 May 2021
by Wiley
Astronomische Nachrichten; doi:10.1002/asna.202113872

Abstract:
We critically discuss recent articles by S. Hoffmann and N. Vogt on historical novae and supernovae (SNe) as well as their list of “24 most promising events” “with rather high probability to be a nova” (Hoffmann et al., AN, 2020, 341, 79 (P3)). Their alleged positional accuracy of previously suggested historical nova/SN records is based on inhomogeneous datasets (Vogt et al.), but then used for the nova search in Hoffmann et al., AN, 2020, 341, 79 (P3). Their claim that previously only “point coordinates” for nova/SN candidates were published, is fabricated. Their estimate of expected nova detection rates is off by a factor of 10 due to mis‐calculation. They accept counterparts down to 4–7 mag at peak, which is against the consensus for the typical limit of naked‐eye discovery. When they discuss previously suggested identifications of historical novae, which they all doubt, they do not present new facts (Hoffmann, MNRAS, 2019, 490, 4194 (P2)). Their catalog of “24 most promising events” for novae (Hoffmann et al., AN, 2020, 341, 79 (P3)) neglects important recent literature (e.g. Pankenier et al., Archeoastronomy in East Asia, New York, Cambria, 2008 and Stephenson and Green, JHA, 2009, 40, 31), the claimed methods are not followed, etc. At least half of their short‐list candidates were and are to be considered comets. For many of the others, duration of more than one night and/or a precise position is missing and/or the sources were treated mistakenly. Two “highlights,” a fabricated SN AD 667–8 and a presumable recurrent nova in AD 891, are already rejected in detail in Neuhäuser et al., MNRAS, 2021a, 501, L1—in both cases, all evidence speaks in favor of comets. There remains only one reliable case, where close to one (possible) historically reported position, a nova shell was already found (AD 1437, Shara et al., Nature, 2017b, 548, 558). Since the proposed positional search areas are not justified due to unfounded textual interpretations (e.g. in fact comets), misunderstandings of historical Chinese astronomy (e.g. incorrect asterism), follow‐up observations cannot be recommended.
, Teeraparb Chantavat, Jenna Zunder
Published: 2 May 2021
by Wiley
Astronomische Nachrichten; doi:10.1002/asna.202113826

The publisher has not yet granted permission to display this abstract.
, Abdullah A. Ansari
Published: 29 April 2021
by Wiley
Astronomische Nachrichten; doi:10.1002/asna.202113870

The publisher has not yet granted permission to display this abstract.
, Mohsen Bigdeli
Published: 15 April 2021
by Wiley
Astronomische Nachrichten; doi:10.1002/asna.202113862

The publisher has not yet granted permission to display this abstract.
, Varvara Vladimirovna Butkovskaya, Nikolai Fedorovich Pankov
Published: 29 March 2021
by Wiley
Astronomische Nachrichten; doi:10.1002/asna.202113858

The publisher has not yet granted permission to display this abstract.
Published: 4 March 2021
by Wiley
Astronomische Nachrichten, Volume 342, pp 515-530; doi:10.1002/asna.202123873

The publisher has not yet granted permission to display this abstract.
, Kiril A. Stoyanov, Josep Mart, Vladislav D. Marchev, Yanko M. Nikolov
Published: 4 March 2021
by Wiley
Astronomische Nachrichten, Volume 342, pp 531-537; doi:10.1002/asna.202123856

The publisher has not yet granted permission to display this abstract.
Published: 4 March 2021
by Wiley
Astronomische Nachrichten, Volume 342, pp 588-597; doi:10.1002/asna.202123869

The publisher has not yet granted permission to display this abstract.
Published: 1 March 2021
by Wiley
Astronomische Nachrichten, Volume 342, pp 479-484; doi:10.1002/asna.202190004

Back to Top Top