A review identified challenges distinguishing primary reports of randomized trials for meta-research: A proposal for improved reporting
- 23 January 2022
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 145, 121-125
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.01.013
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PJT-153045)
- National Health and Medical Research Council (1143429)
- National Institute on Aging
- National Institutes of Health (U54AG063546)
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consent processes in cluster-randomised trials in residential facilities for older adults: a systematic review of reporting practices and proposed guidelinesBMJ Open, 2013
- Reporting characteristics of non-primary publications of results of randomized trials: a cross-sectional reviewTrials, 2013
- Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trialsBMJ, 2012
- Systematic review of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials shows that design is particularly used to evaluate interventions during routine implementationJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Impact of CONSORT extension for cluster randomised trials on quality of reporting and study methodology: review of random sample of 300 trials, 2000-8BMJ, 2011
- Inadequate reporting of research ethics review and informed consent in cluster randomised trials: review of random sample of published trialsBMJ, 2011
- Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting GuidelinesPLoS Medicine, 2010
- Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled TrialsJAMA, 2009
- CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstractsThe Lancet, 2008
- Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journalsThe Lancet, 2005