Prognostic factors for predicting health-related quality of life after intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures: a randomized controlled trial
Open Access
- 1 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery in Bone & Joint Open
- Vol. 2 (1), 22-32
- https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.21.bjo-2020-0150.r1
Abstract
Aims Using tibial shaft fracture participants from a large, multicentre randomized controlled trial, we investigated if patient and surgical factors were associated with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at one year post-surgery. Methods The Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Patients with Tibial Fractures (SPRINT) trial examined adults with an open or closed tibial shaft fracture who were treated with either reamed or unreamed intramedullary nails. HRQoL was assessed at hospital discharge (for pre-injury level) and at 12 months post-fracture using the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) Dysfunction, SMFA Bother, 36-Item Short Form 36 (SF-36) Physical, and SF-36 Mental Component scores. We used multiple linear regression analysis to determine if baseline and surgical factors, as well as post-intervention procedures within one year of fracture, were associated with these HRQoL outcomes. Significance was set at p < 0.01. We hypothesize that, irrespective of the four measures used, prognosis is guided by both modifiable and non-modifiable factors and that patients do not return to their pre-injury level of function, nor HRQoL. Results For patient and surgical factors, only pre-injury quality of life and isolated fracture showed a statistical effect on all four HRQoL outcomes, while high-energy injury mechanism, smoking, and race or ethnicity, demonstrated statistical significance for three of the four HRQoL outcomes. Patients who did not require reoperation in response to infection, the need for bone grafts, and/or the need for implant exchanges had statistically superior HRQoL outcomes than those who did require intervention within one year after initial tibial fracture nailing. Conclusion We identified several baseline patient factors, surgical factors, and post-intervention procedures within one year after intramedullary nailing of a tibial shaft fracture that may influence a patient’s HRQoL. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(1):22–32.This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Smoking and socioeconomic status in England: the rise of the never smoker and the disadvantaged smokerJournal of Public Health, 2012
- The use of gentamicin-coated nails in the tibia: preliminary results of a prospective studyArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2011
- Use of both short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire and short form-36 among tibial-fracture patients was redundantJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
- Randomized Trial of Reamed and Unreamed Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft FracturesJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2008
- Long-Term Follow-up of Tibial Shaft Fractures Treated With Intramedullary NailingJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2008
- Time-Action Analysis (TAA) of the Surgical Technique Implanting the Collum Femoris Preserving (CFP) Hip Arthroplasty. TAASTIC trial Identifying pitfalls during the learning curve of surgeons participating in a subsequent randomized controlled trial (An observational study)BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2008
- Study to prospectively evaluate reamed intramedually nails in patients with tibial fractures (S.P.R.I.N.T.): Study rationale and designBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2008
- A systematic review: How to choose appropriate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in routine general practice?Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE, 2005
- COMPLICATIONS OF INTERLOCKING NAILING FOR LOWER LEG FRACTURESThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 1992
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992